Synthesis and characterization of poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐ caprolactone) copolymers: influence of sequential monomer addition on chain microstructure
Abstract
A series of copolymers with various compositions were synthesized by one‐step and two‐step bulk ring‐opening polymerizations of L‐lactide (LA) and ε‐caprolactone (CL) using stannous octoate [Sn(Oct)2] and 1‐hexanol as the initiating system. For the sequential two‐step polymerization, a poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) prepolymer was polymerized first to a percent conversion of approximately 70% and LA then added in order to produce a copolymer with a chain microstructure different from that obtained from the corresponding one‐step reaction. The resulting copolymers were characterized using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H‐ and 13 C‐NMR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The average sequence lengths of the lactidyl ($l_{{\rm LL}}^{\rm e}$) and caproyl ($l_{{\rm cap}}^{\rm e}$) units, the degree of randomness (R) and the transesterification coefficient (T(II)) were calculated from the 13 C‐NMR spectra. The appearance of a signal due to CapLCap sequences was directly attributable to transesterification of lactidyl (LL) units. It was found that both $l_{{\rm LL}}^{\rm e}$ and $l_{{\rm cap}}^{\rm e}$ values from the two‐step syntheses were significantly longer than from the corresponding one‐step syntheses, leading to different semi‐crystalline morphologies and chain microstructures. The copolymers all showed at least some blocky chain structure as a result of the significant difference in monomer reactivity (LA > CL) between LA and CL. Thermal properties including stability depended on both composition and chain microstructure which could be controlled by the method of synthesis. From their DSC curves, the two‐step copolymers were seen to be semi‐crystalline whereas the one‐step copolymers were mainly amorphous. A more blocky microstructure, as obtained from the two‐step method, appeared to result in a lower thermal stability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sn(Oct)2 under similar conditions produces copolymers of much higher randomness.
“The synthesis of highly blocky copolymers in the melt is not an easy task, Sn(Oct)2 under similar conditions produces copolymers of much higher randomness.88”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Nalampang, K., Molloy, R., & Punyodom, W.
- Affiliations
- Chiang Mai University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Nalampang, K.
- Venue
- Polymers for Advanced Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-248
- ISSN
- 1042-7147 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1581
- OpenAlex
- W2027067834
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polymers for Advanced Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chiang Mai University
- National Metal and Materials Technology Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
- Keywords
- poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), ring-opening polymerization, sequential monomer addition, chain microstructure, block copolymers, transesterification, 1-hexanol, degree of randomness, sequence length, thermal stability, reactivity ratios
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review