Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Response of mouse lung to crocidolite asbestos. 1. Minimal fibrotic reaction to short fibres

Adamson, Ian Y. R., Bowden, Drummond H.·1987·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

To determine the relationship between the development of pulmonary fibrosis and the size of deposited asbestos, we prepared a pure sample of short crocidolite fibres and instilled 0.5 mg of 0.1 mg to the lungs of mice. Animals were killed up to 20 weeks later with 3 H thymidine injected 1 h before death. By bronchoalveolar lavage, there was a rapid transient increase in polymorph neutrophils (PMN) and in glucosaminidase levels; alveolar macrophage (AM) numbers were elevated in the 0.5 mg group for eight weeks. Most fibres were phagocytized by AM, many of which were heavily laden and cleared from the lung over the 20 week period. Some fibres were seen in type 1 epithelial cells, frequently associated with cell injury. From cell kinetic studies, a very brief proliferative response was seen in bronchiolar epithelial and Type 2 alveolar epithelial cells. A greater response was seen in interstitial fibroblasts which showed increased labelling up to two weeks after 0.5 mg asbestos. However no granulomas were seen and very little fibrosis was found by morphology or by biochemistry at any time after 0.5 mg; no fibrosis was seen after instilling 0.1 mg. The results show that a high dose of exclusively short asbestos fibres produces minimal lung injury and fibrosis in spite of long standing macrophage‐fibre interaction in the alveoli.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1711520206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1056/NEJM198206173062403 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0046-8177(84)80332-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1136/thx.39.11.801 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/path.1711470404 · DOI
  5. Aalto M, 1984, Fibrogenesis by mineral fibres: an in vitro study of the roles of macrophages and fibre length, Br J Exp Pathol, 65, 91
  6. Lemaire I, 1983, Asbestos exposure enhances the release of fibroblast growth factor by sheep alveolar macrophages, J Reticuloendothel Soc, 33, 275
  7. Warheit DB, 1985, Inhaled asbestos activates a complement‐dependent chemoattractant for macrophages, Lab Invest, 52, 505
  8. Filipenko D, 1985, Pathologic changes in the small airways of the guinea pig after amosite asbestos exposure, Am J Pathol, 119, 273
  9. Warheit DB, 1984, Pulmonary macrophage accumulation and asbestos‐induced lesions at sites of fiber deposition, Am Rev Respir Dis, 129, 301
  10. Brody AR, 1981, Chrysotile asbestos inhalation in rats: deposition pattern and reaction of alveolar epithelium and pulmonary macrophages, Am Rev Respir Dis, 123, 670
  11. Adamson IYR, 1986, Crocidolite induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice: cytokinetic and biochemical studies, Am J Pathol, 122, 261
  12. 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90683-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  14. Woessner JF, 1976, The Methodology of Connective Tissue Research, 227
  15. 10.1136/thx.37.11.803 · DOI
  16. Adamson IYR, 1982, Chemotactic and mitogenic components of the alveolar macrophage response to particles and neutrophil chemoattractant, Am J Pathol, 109, 71
  17. Kagan E, 1983, Enhanced release of a chemoattractant for alveolar macrophages after asbestos inhalation, Am Rev Respir Dis, 128, 680
  18. 10.1289/ehp.749271 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adamson, I. Y. R., & Bowden, D. H.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-06
Volume
152
Issue
2
Pages
99-107
ISSN
  • 0022-3417
  • 1096-9896
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review