Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proliferative index in breast carcinoma determined in situ by Ki67 immunostaining and its relationship to clinical and pathological variables

Barnard, Nicola J., Hall, P. A., Lemoine, N. R., Kadar, N.·1987·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Sixty cases of primary breast carcinoma have been studied using a monoclonal antibody, Ki67, which recognizes an antigen expressed by cells in G1, S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle but not Go. A Ki67 score (positive cells/total tumour cells) was determined, and possible relationships between this index of cellular proliferation and a number of clinical and pathological parameters were investigated. There was a strong positive correlation between the Ki67 score and mitotic index ( p < 0.001), a weak negative correlation with age ( p < 0.02), and weak positive correlations with histological tumour grade ( p < 0.03), tumour necrosis ( p < 0.01), and cellular reaction ( p < 0.01). No relationship was noted between the Ki67 score and tumour size, nodal status, tumour oestrogen receptor levels, or menopausal status. The Ki67 score may prove to be an objective indicator of biological behaviour and thus be of clinical significance, particularly since it is not strongly related to other clinical and pathological parameters used in predicting outcome in breast carcinoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1711520407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Barnard, N. J., Hall, P. A., Lemoine, N. R., & Kadar, N.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-08
Volume
152
Issue
4
Pages
287-295
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2015825004
Cited by
243
References
1
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.