The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of six antibodies for immunohistochemistry of mutant p53 gene product in archival colorectal neoplasms
Abstract
Immunohistochemical detection of intranuclear p53 gene product may indicate mutation of the p53 suppressor gene on chromosome 17p. We used six commercially available antibodies for p53 immunohistochemistry on 19 archival colorectal neoplasms and compared the results with the mutation status of the p53 gene and 17p allelic deletion status. By Friedman's ranking analysis, use of mouse monoclonal antibody DO7 with Target Unmasking Fluid (TUF) for antigen retrieval was the most sensitive and specific procedure (P<0·0001). Six of 7 cases with high expression (p53 Labeling Index >30 per cent using a CAS 200 image analyser) had p53 mutation. Of seven tumours without expression (LI < 1 per cent), six had no mutation and one had a truncating mutation which prohibited nuclear localization of gene product. The low expression group (1 per cent < LI <30 per cent, n = 5) consisted of three tumours without and two tumours with mutation. The sensitivity of high expression with the DO7–TUF method for p53 gene mutation was 67 per cent with specificity of 90 per cent, predictive value of a positive of 86 per cent, predictive value of a negative of 75 per cent, and efficiency of 79 per cent. This study suggests that immunohistochemistry is valuable for assessing p53 gene mutations in colorectal neoplasms, but further study is needed to elucidate the precise link between immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic alterations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lane, D. P. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358015a0 · Cited by 5,138
Amplification of a gene encoding a p53-associated protein in human sarcomas
Oliner, J. D., Kinzler, K. W., Meltzer, P. S., George, D. L., & Vogelstein, B. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358080a0 · Cited by 1,949
Self-citation
Cited by
(1999) · PubMed · Cited by 2,204
Molecular Predictors of Survival after Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer
Watanabe, T., Wu, T.-T., Catalano, P. J., Ueki, T., Satriano, R., Haller, D. G., Benson, A. B., & Hamilton, S. R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200104193441603 · Cited by 888
Self-citationAllelic Loss of Chromosome 18q and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
Jen, J., Kim, H., Piantadosi, S., Liu, Z.-F., Levitt, R. C., Sistonen, P., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Hamilton, S. R. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199407283310401 · Cited by 696
Self-citationBrennan, J. A., Boyle, J. O., Koch, W. M., Goodman, S. N., Hruban, R. H., Eby, Y. J., Couch, M. J., Forastiere, A. A., & Sidransky, D. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503163321104 · Cited by 658
p53 In tumour pathology: Can we trust immunohistochemistry?—revisited!
Hall, P. A., & Lane, D. P. (1994) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1711720103 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Baas, I. O., Mulder, J. R., Offerhaus, G. J. A., Vogelstein, B., & Hamilton, S. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-12
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2088098884
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of six antibodies for immunohistochemistry of mutant p53 gene product in archival colorectal neoplasms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/path.1711720104
- The paper
- Baas, I. O., Mulder, J. R., Offerhaus, G. J. A., Vogelstein, B., & Hamilton, S. R. (1994). An evaluation of six antibodies for immunohistochemistry of mutant p53 gene product in archival colorectal neoplasms. The Journal of Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711720104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.