The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: Comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis
Abstract
In some studies of breast cancer, quantitation of immunohistochemically highlighted microvessel ‘hot spots’ has been shown to be a powerful prognostic tool. However, the antibody used, the number and size of the ‘hot spots’ assessed, and the stratification of patients into high and low vascular groups vary between studies. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between microvessel density and other vascular parameters. These uncertainties and the laborious nature of the technique make it unsuitable for diagnostic practice. Both manual and computerized image analysis techniques were used in this study to examine the relationship between microvessel density and the vascular parameters in different sized microscopic fields in a pilot series of 30 invasive breast carcinomas. Automated pixel analysis of immunohistochemical staining, Chalkley point counting, and observer subjective vascular grading were also assessed as more rapid methods of measuring tumour vascularity. A Chalkley count was also performed on a further 211 invasive breast carcinomas. Significant correlations were observed between manual microvessel density and luminal perimeter (r=0·6, P=0·0004), luminal area (r=0·56, P=0·002), and microvessel number (r=0·57, P=0·0009) by computerized analysis. There were also significant correlations between the microscopic hot spots of 0·155 mm 2 and 0.848 mm 2 for microvessel number (r=0·81, P>0·00005), luminal perimeter (r=0·78, P<0·00005), and luminal area (r=0·65, P=0·0001). In addition, a significant correlation was observed between microvessel density and both subjective vascular grade (P=0·002) and Chalkley count (P=0·0001). A significant reduction in overall survival was observed between patients stratified by Chalkley count in both a univariate (P=0·02) and a multivariate (P=0·05) analysis in the 211 invasive breast carcinomas. These findings show that Chalkley counting is a rapid method of quantifying tumour angiogenesis and gives independent prognostic information which might be useful in diagnostic practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orimo, A., Gupta, P. B., Sgroi, D. C., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., Delaunay, T., Naeem, R., Carey, V. J., Richardson, A. L., & Weinberg, R. A. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.034 · Cited by 3,759
Maxwell, P. H., Dachs, G. U., Gleadle, J. M., Nicholls, L. G., Harris, A. L., Stratford, I. J., Hankinson, O., Pugh, C. W., & Ratcliffe, P. J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.15.8104 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationO'Byrne, K. J., Koukourakis, M. I., Giatromanolaki, A., Cox, G., Turley, H., Steward, W. P., Gatter, K., & Langrish, V (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.1999.1129 · Cited by 275
Self-citationThe Influence of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Angiogenesis During the Early Phase of Tendon Healing
Lyras, D. N., Kazakos, K., Verettas, D., Polychronidis, A., Tryfonidis, M., Botaitis, S., Agrogiannis, G., Simopoulos, C., Kokka, A., & Patsouris, E. (2009) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.3113/fai.2009.1101 · Cited by 147
Mohammed, R. A. A., Ellis, I. O., Mahmmod, A. M., Hawkes, E. C., Green, A. R., Rakha, E. A., & Martin, S. G. (2011) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2011.4 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, S. B., Leek, R. D., Weekes, M. P., Whitehouse, R. M., Gatter, K. C., & Harris, A. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-283
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2003032376
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: Comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/path.1711770310
- The paper
- Fox, S. B., Leek, R. D., Weekes, M. P., Whitehouse, R. M., Gatter, K. C., & Harris, A. L. (1995). Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: Comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis. The Journal of Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711770310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.