The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytogenetic and pathogenic effects of long and short amosite asbestos
Abstract
This study utilized two samples of amosite asbestos which differ in their length, but not in their diameter and which have been shown previously to have very different abilities to cause pathology in rats exposed by instillation or inhalation. The activity of these amosite samples in causing chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells in culture was examined, along with the effect of the glutathione (GSH) synthesis‐inhibiting agent buthionine sulphoximine. The incidence of chromosomal aberrations in cells treated with the short fibre sample was similar to control levels; the long amosite sample caused significantly more chromosomal aberrations than the short fibre sample. When cells were treated with buthionine sulphoximine to decrease the levels of intracellular glutathione, the incidence of chromosomal aberrations was increased in the control cells, but also on treatment with both short and long amosite, the long sample again being considerably more active than the short. The pathogenicity of the long amosite may result from the ability of the fibres to cause chromosome damage, while the enhancement of this damage caused by decreasing intracellular glutathione suggests that the asbestos fibres may impose an oxidant stress on the cells which contributes to these aberrations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The authors underlined that the grinding step of the LAF sample used to reduce the fibers’ size did not affect their crystallinity, and that the SAF sample did not contain WHO fibers.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [83]
In the citing paper
“Chromosomal aberrations and hyperploidy were detected in CHO (Chinese Hamster Ovary) cells incubated with the LAF sample, but not with the SAF sample at equivalent mass.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cites
Griffith, O. W., & Meister, A. (1979) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)35980-5 · Cited by 1,683
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1164/ajrccm/143.2.408 · DOI · Paper page
- Hesterberg TW, 1990, Dependence of asbestos and mineral dust induced transformation of mammalian cells on fibre dimension, Cancer Res, 44, 115
- Davis JMG, 1985, The pathogenicity of long versus short fibres of amosite asbestos administered to rats by inhalation and intraperitoneal injection, Br J Exp Pathol, 67, 415
- Donaldson K, 1989, The inflammation generating potential of long and short fibre amosite asbestos samples, Br J Ind Med, 46, 271
- LiXY DonaldsonK RahmanI MacNeeW.An investigation of the role of glutathione in the increased epithelial permeability induced by cigarette smokein vitroandin vivo.Am Rev Respir Crit Care Med (in press).
- 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.1.L92 · DOI
- 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90117-Y · DOI · Paper page
- Oshimura MJ, 1984, Correlation of asbestos‐induced cytogenetic effects with cell transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells in culture, Cancer Res, 44, 5017
- 10.1016/0165-1218(86)90093-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0887-2333(92)90051-R · DOI
- Cora E, 1991, Expression of the tumour suppressor gene p53 during the development of murine malignant mesotheliomas induced by asbestos fibres, FASEB J, 5, A1442
- 10.1136/thx.48.4.390 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/58.3.587 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/oem.52.2.92 · DOI
- 10.1002/path.1711680214 · DOI
- Donaldson K, 1993, Asbestos fibre length‐dependent detachment injury to alveolar epithelial cells in vitro: role of fibronectin‐binding receptor, Int J Exp Pathol, 74, 243
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Donaldson, K., Murphy, F. A., Duffin, R., & Poland, C. A. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-5 · Cited by 916
Self-citationBoulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Reactive Oxygen Species a Double-Edged Sword for Mesothelioma
Benedetti, S., Nuvoli, B., Catalani, S., & Galati, R. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4253 · Cited by 97
Mesothelium and Malignant Mesothelioma
Hiriart, E., Deepe, R., & Wessels, A. (2019) · Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.3390/jdb7020007 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Donaldson, K., & Golyasnya, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-307
- ISSN
- 0022-3417
- 1096-9896
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review