Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cytogenetic and pathogenic effects of long and short amosite asbestos

Donaldson, Kenneth, Golyasnya, Nadya·1995·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

This study utilized two samples of amosite asbestos which differ in their length, but not in their diameter and which have been shown previously to have very different abilities to cause pathology in rats exposed by instillation or inhalation. The activity of these amosite samples in causing chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells in culture was examined, along with the effect of the glutathione (GSH) synthesis‐inhibiting agent buthionine sulphoximine. The incidence of chromosomal aberrations in cells treated with the short fibre sample was similar to control levels; the long amosite sample caused significantly more chromosomal aberrations than the short fibre sample. When cells were treated with buthionine sulphoximine to decrease the levels of intracellular glutathione, the incidence of chromosomal aberrations was increased in the control cells, but also on treatment with both short and long amosite, the long sample again being considerably more active than the short. The pathogenicity of the long amosite may result from the ability of the fibres to cause chromosome damage, while the enhancement of this damage caused by decreasing intracellular glutathione suggests that the asbestos fibres may impose an oxidant stress on the cells which contributes to these aberrations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1711770313

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1164/ajrccm/143.2.408 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hesterberg TW, 1990, Dependence of asbestos and mineral dust induced transformation of mammalian cells on fibre dimension, Cancer Res, 44, 115
  3. Davis JMG, 1985, The pathogenicity of long versus short fibres of amosite asbestos administered to rats by inhalation and intraperitoneal injection, Br J Exp Pathol, 67, 415
  4. Donaldson K, 1989, The inflammation generating potential of long and short fibre amosite asbestos samples, Br J Ind Med, 46, 271
  5. LiXY DonaldsonK RahmanI MacNeeW.An investigation of the role of glutathione in the increased epithelial permeability induced by cigarette smokein vitroandin vivo.Am Rev Respir Crit Care Med (in press).
  6. 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.1.L92 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90117-Y · DOI · Paper page
  8. Oshimura MJ, 1984, Correlation of asbestos‐induced cytogenetic effects with cell transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells in culture, Cancer Res, 44, 5017
  9. 10.1016/0165-1218(86)90093-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0887-2333(92)90051-R · DOI
  11. Cora E, 1991, Expression of the tumour suppressor gene p53 during the development of murine malignant mesotheliomas induced by asbestos fibres, FASEB J, 5, A1442
  12. 10.1136/thx.48.4.390 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/jnci/58.3.587 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1136/oem.52.2.92 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/path.1711680214 · DOI
  16. Donaldson K, 1993, Asbestos fibre length‐dependent detachment injury to alveolar epithelial cells in vitro: role of fibronectin‐binding receptor, Int J Exp Pathol, 74, 243

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Donaldson, K., & Golyasnya, N.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
177
Issue
3
Pages
303-307
ISSN
  • 0022-3417
  • 1096-9896
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review