The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The basal‐like breast carcinoma phenotype is regulated by SLUG gene expression
Abstract
Basal‐like breast carcinoma is an aggressive form of breast cancer, characterized by the absence of oestrogen receptor and HER2 expression, the presence of cytokeratin 5 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression, and by the up‐regulation of stem cell regulatory genes. We show here that tumour tissues expressing high levels of SLUG mRNA show a basal‐like breast carcinoma phenotype and that such tumours also express high levels of stem cell‐regulatory genes, ie CD133, Bmi1. Further, we show that stem/progenitor cells, isolated from ductal breast carcinoma and from normal mammary gland as mammospheres, express SLUG, CD133, and Bmi1 mRNA and show a phenotype similar to that of basal‐like breast carcinoma. We also report that SLUG expression in tumour tissues correlates with that of the hypoxia survival gene carbonic anhydrase IX. In this regard, we report that the exposure of SLUG‐negative/luminal‐like MCF‐7 cells to a hypoxic environment promotes the onset of the basal‐like breast carcinoma phenotype, together with up‐regulation of the SLUG gene, which in turn blunts oestrogen receptor‐α and boosts carbonic anhydrase IX gene expression. Finally, we show that SLUG expression promotes the invasiveness of MCF‐7 cells exposed to hypoxia and sustains the in vivo aggressiveness of hypoxia‐selected, MCF‐7‐derived cells in xenografts. These data indicate that SLUG gene expression is part of a hypoxia‐induced genetic programme which sets up a basal/stem cell‐like, aggressive phenotype in breast cancer cells. Copyright © 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular classification of breast cancer: implications for selection of adjuvant chemotherapy
Andre, F., & Pusztai, L. (2006) · Nature Clinical Practice Oncology · doi:10.1038/ncponc0636 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Genetic Predisposition Directs Breast Cancer Phenotype by Dictating Progenitor Cell Fate
Proia, T. A., Keller, P. J., Gupta, P. B., Klebba, I., Jones, A. D., Sedic, M., Gilmore, H., Tung, N., Naber, S. P., Schnitt, S., et al. (2011) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.007 · Cited by 393
Siddique, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2012) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1002/stem.1035 · Cited by 339
Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and breast cancer
Tomaskovic-Crook, E., Thompson, E. W., & Thiery, J. P. (2009) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr2416 · Cited by 318
Interaction with Suv39H1 is critical for Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression in breast cancer
Dong, C., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Kang, T., Rychahou, P. G., Chi, Y.-I., Evers, B. M., & Zhou, B. P. (2013) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.169 · Cited by 214
Mouse Snail Is a Target Gene for HIF
Luo, D., Wang, J., Li, J., & Post, M. (2011) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-10-0214 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Storci, G., Sansone, P., Trere, D., Tavolari, S., Taffurelli, M., Ceccarelli, C., Guarnieri, T., Paterini, P., Pariali, M., Montanaro, L., Santini, D., Chieco, P., & Bonafé, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-31
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-37
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2136029503
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.