The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secretory cell outgrowth, PAX2 and serous carcinogenesis in the Fallopian tube
Open accessAbstract
The ‘p53 signature’ is a benign secretory cell outgrowth in the distal Fallopian tube that shares properties with ovarian serous cancer—including p53 mutations—and is a putative serous cancer precursor. We expanded the precursor definition to all secretory cell outgrowths (SCOUTs) of 30 or more cells and scored normal (N) and altered (A) expression of both p53 and PAX2, a gene down‐regulated in ovarian and endometrial cancer. SCOUTs were identified by BCL2/p73 staining in tubes from women with serous carcinoma, inherited mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and controls. SCOUTs were prevalent in both proximal and distal tube and significantly associated with serous carcinoma versus the others (p < 0.001); 89% were PAX2 (A) and 26% were PAX2 (A)/p53 (A) (p53 signatures). PAX2 (A)/p53 (N) SCOUTs were free of p53 mutations; however, 12 of 13 p53 signatures were PAX2 (A). A tubal carcinoma and contiguous SCOUT were p53 (A)/PAX2 (A) and shared the same p53 mutation. SCOUTs are discretely localized alterations commonly containing altered expression of multiple genes within histologically benign tubal epithelium. Geographic distribution in the tube varies by genotype and immunophenotype, from regionally unrestricted (PAX2) to greater likelihood specific area (fimbria) of shared prevalence (PAX2 and p53). This study reveals, for the first time, an entity (SCOUT) that is associated with serous cancer, expands the topography of altered PAX2 expression in the female genital tract mucosa and highlights another potential pathway disturbance involved in early serous carcinogenesis in the Fallopian tube. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
New Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Serous Ovarian Cancer and Its Clinical Impact
Levanon, K., Crum, C., & Drapkin, R. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1107 · Cited by 412
Self-citation
Cited by
The Notch and Wnt pathways regulate stemness and differentiation in human fallopian tube organoids
Kessler, M., Hoffmann, K., Brinkmann, V., Thieck, O., Jackisch, S., Toelle, B., Berger, H., Mollenkopf, H.-J., Mangler, M., Sehouli, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9989 · Cited by 459
Huang, H., Hsu, C., Chu, S., Chen, P., Ding, D., Chang, M., & Chu, T. (2016) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4807 · Cited by 38
The many microenvironments of ovarian cancer
Micek, H. M., Visetsouk, M. R., Fleszar, A. J., & Kreeger, P. K. (2020) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59038-3_12 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, E. Y., Mehra, K., Mehrad, M., Ning, G., Miron, A., Mutter, G. L., Monte, N., Quade, B. J., McKeon, F. D., Yassin, Y., Xian, W., & Crum, C. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-116
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W1988175987
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.