The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Germline and somatic polymerase ϵ and δ mutations define a new class of hypermutated colorectal and endometrial cancers
Open accessAbstract
Polymerases ϵ and δ are the main enzymes that replicate eukaryotic DNA. Accurate replication occurs through Watson–Crick base pairing and also through the action of the polymerases' exonuclease (proofreading) domains. We have recently shown that germline exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs) of POLE and POLD1 confer a high risk of multiple colorectal adenomas and carcinoma (CRC). POLD1 mutations also predispose to endometrial cancer (EC). These mutations are associated with high penetrance and dominant inheritance, although the phenotype can be variable. We have named the condition polymerase proofreading‐associated polyposis (PPAP). Somatic POLE EDMs have also been found in sporadic CRCs and ECs, although very few somatic POLD1 EDMs have been detected. Both the germline and the somatic DNA polymerase EDMs cause an ‘ultramutated’, apparently microsatellite‐stable, type of cancer, sometimes leading to over a million base substitutions per tumour. Here, we present the evidence for POLE and POLD1 as important contributors to the pathogenesis of CRC and EC, and highlight some of the key questions in this emerging field. Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B. A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 · Cited by 17,455
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer
Seshagiri, S., Stawiski, E. W., Durinck, S., Modrusan, Z., Storm, E. E., Conboy, C. B., Chaudhuri, S., Guan, Y., Janakiraman, V., Jaiswal, B. S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11282 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden
Chalmers, Z. R., Connelly, C. F., Fabrizio, D., Gay, L., Ali, S. M., Ennis, R., Schrock, A., Campbell, B., Shlien, A., Chmielecki, J., et al. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0424-2 · Cited by 3,519
Molecular pathological classification of colorectal cancer
Müller, M. F., Ibrahim, A. E. K., & Arends, M. J. (2016) · Virchows Archiv · doi:10.1007/s00428-016-1956-3 · Cited by 432
Borelli, B., Antoniotti, C., Carullo, M., Germani, M. M., Conca, V., & Masi, G. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14204974 · Cited by 62
DNA Polymerase ε Deficiency Leading to an Ultramutator Phenotype: A Novel Clinically Relevant Entity
Castellucci, E., He, T., Goldstein, D. Y., Halmos, B., & Chuy, J. (2017) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0034 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Briggs, S., & Tomlinson, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- Volume
- 230
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-153
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W1604315162
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.