Mechanisms of age‐related macular degeneration and therapeutic opportunities
Abstract
As the age of the population increases in many nations, age‐related degenerative diseases pose significant socioeconomic challenges. One of the key degenerative diseases that compromise quality of life is age‐related macular degeneration ( AMD ). AMD is a multi‐faceted condition that affects the central retina, which ultimately leads to blindness in millions of people worldwide. The pathophysiology and risk factors for AMD are complex, and the symptoms manifest in multiple related but distinct forms. The ability to develop effective treatments for AMD will depend on a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, risk factors, and driver molecular pathways, as well as the ability to develop useful animal models. This review provides an overview of the aforementioned aspects in AMD . Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Markers of autophagy and exosomes have been found in the RPE of aged mice as well as in drusen from cadaveric eyes from people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
“For example, markers of autophagy and exosomes have been found in the RPE of aged mice as well as in drusen from cadaveric eyes from people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 16”
From Deletion of autophagy inducer <i>RB1CC1</i> results in degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium (2015) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 149 · Cited by 382
- Authors
- van Lookeren Campagne, M., LeCouter, J., Yaspan, B. L., & Ye, W.
- Affiliations
- Immunology Department Genentech South San Francisco CA 94080 USA
- Genentech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Weilan
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-10
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-164
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2145027167
- Semantic Scholar
- bd1d6a063694e940a23bc6528c3142aeacacefdf
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- age-related macular degeneration, pathophysiology, risk factors, molecular pathways, animal models, AMD treatment, retinal degeneration, blindness
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Phenotype, Retina, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review