Cited by 61Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Diseases and ImmunityLiver Disease and Transplantation

High‐throughput sequencing identifies aetiology‐dependent differences in ductular reaction in human chronic liver disease

Open access
Govaere, Olivier, Cockell, Simon, Van Haele, Matthias, Wouters, Jasper, Van Delm, Wouter, Van den Eynde, Kathleen, Bianchi, Arianna, van Eijsden, Rudy +4 more·2019·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Ductular reaction (DR) represents the activation of hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) and has been associated with features of advanced chronic liver disease; yet it is not clear whether these cells contribute to disease progression and how the composition of their micro‐environment differs depending on the aetiology. This study aimed to identify HPC‐associated signalling pathways relevant in different chronic liver diseases using a high‐throughput sequencing approach. DR/HPCs were isolated using laser microdissection from patient samples diagnosed with HCV or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), as models for hepatocellular or biliary regeneration. Key signals were validated at the protein level for a cohort of 56 patients (20 early and 36 advanced stage). In total, 330 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the HPCs in HCV and PSC. Recruitment and homing of inflammatory cells were distinctly different depending on the aetiology. HPCs in PSC were characterised by a response to oxidative stress (e.g. JUN, VNN1) and neutrophil‐attractant chemokines (CXCL5, CXCL6, IL‐8), whereas HPCs in HCV were identified by T‐ and B‐lymphocyte infiltration. Moreover, we found that communication between HPCs and macrophages was aetiology driven. In PSC, a high frequency of CCL28‐positive macrophages was observed in the portal infiltrate, already in early disease in the absence of advanced fibrosis, while in HCV, HPCs showed a strong expression of the macrophage scavenger receptor MARCO. Interestingly, DR/HPCs in PSC showed more deposition of ECM (e.g. FN1, LAMC2, collagens) compared to HCV, where an increase of pro‐invasive genes (e.g. PDGFRA, IGF2) was observed. Additionally, endothelial cells in the vicinity of DR/HPCs showed differential immunopositivity (e.g. IGF2 and INHBA expression). In conclusion, our data shine light on the role of DR/HPCs in immune signalling, fibrogenesis and angiogenesis in chronic liver disease. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.5228

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 61

Authors
Govaere, O., Cockell, S., Van Haele, M., Wouters, J., Van Delm, W., Van den Eynde, K., Bianchi, A., van Eijsden, R., Van Steenbergen, W., Monbaliu, D., Nevens, F., & Roskams, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Department of Imaging and Pathology KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
  • VIB Nucleomics Core KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Department of Hepatology KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Corresponding author
Govaere, Olivier
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
248
Issue
1
Pages
66-76
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2906461986
Cited by
61
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  • Kom op tegen Kanker
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
ductular reaction, hepatic progenitor cells, chronic liver disease, hepatitis C virus, primary sclerosing cholangitis, oxidative stress, chemokines, macrophage recruitment, MARCO, CCL28, lymphocyte infiltration, extracellular matrix deposition, fibrogenesis, angiogenesis, endothelial cells, gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Extracellular Matrix, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Liver Diseases, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Stem Cells, Cholangitis, Sclerosing, Signal Transduction, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Hepatocytes, Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional, Stem Cell Niche, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review