The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tensile behavior of nanocomposites from latex and cellulose whiskers
Abstract
Cellulose whiskers have been used as reinforcement in a copolymer matrix prepared from a latex phase. If a water suspension‐mixing procedure is adopted, the fibril breakage that usually occurs during the mixing with a molten polymer can be avoided, and an enhanced filler dispersion can be expected. In this study, different processing methods have been used to prepare composite films, either by film casting (water evaporation) or by freeze drying, followed by classical compression or extrusion processes. The thermomechanical properties of these nanocomposites have been investigated, and the influence of processing conditions and the effect of whisker content have been considered. Processing conditions have a large influence on the mechanical behavior and can be classified in ascending order of their reinforcement efficiency: It can be attributed to a decrease of the apparent whisker aspect ratio, due to gradual breakage and/or orientation of the whiskers when hot pressing or extrusion is used. Below Tg, good agreement is found between experimental moduli and the theoretical predictions of the Halpin‐Kardos equation. On the other hand, above Tg, a spectacular reinforcing effect is observed, which is widely underestimated by this short fiber composite model. This is related to the presence of a rigid cellulose network, linked by hydrogen bonds, when the whisker content is above its percolation threshold. The quality of this network (i.e., density and homogeneity) and thus, the magnitude of the reinforcing effect, depend on processing conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Self-citation
Cited by
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Azizi Samir, M. A. S., Alloin, F., & Dufresne, A. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0493685 · Cited by 2,311
Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review
(2008) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 · Cited by 901
Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement
Zimmermann, T., Pöhler, E., & Geiger, T. (2004) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.200400097 · Cited by 598
Metadata
- Authors
- Hajji, P., Cavaillé, J. Y., Favier, V., Gauthier, C., & Vigier, G.
- Venue
- Polymer Composites
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 612-619
- ISSN
- 0272-8397 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-0569
- OpenAlex
- W2064691209
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.