Cited by 27Chromatography in Natural ProductsAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsTraditional Chinese Medicine Analysis

Chemical fingerprinting of Lawsonia inermis L. using HPLC, HPTLC and densitometry

Gallo, Francesca Romana, Multari, Giuseppina, Giambenedetti, Massimo, Federici, Elena·2008·Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract

Introduction – Lawsonia inermis L. is a natural red colouring agent, commonly named “Henna”, which is used to dye skin and hair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of L. inermis that is commercially available as a raw plant material or preparation in order to guarantee good quality products. Objective − To develop a simple protocol for the qualification of different samples labelled as L. inermis by using the HPTLC densitometry method and to identify possible adulterations with other plants. Methodology − Samples of leaves of L. inermis were extracted with methanol. Two chromatographic methods were developed to determine the chemical fingerprinting of L. inermis. The first was based on HPTLC identification followed by densitometric measurements at 337 nm. The second was based on RP‐HPLC separation with gradient elution and photodiode array detection at 337 nm. Samples of Cassia obovata Collad., and Indigofera tinctoria L., were treated in the same way. Results – The simplicity of the sample preparation, and the possibility of analysing several samples of herbal products simultaneously in a short time, make HPTLC the method of choice. The HPTLC method was feasible for the comprehensive quality evaluation of herbal products. From the comparison of their “fingerprint”, it was possible to detect substitution of plants that are different from those declared on the label. Conclusion − The HPTLC may be used as a rapid method by which to control the quality of raw plant materials and formulations based on the title plant. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pca.1084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallo, F. R., Multari, G., Giambenedetti, M., & Federici, E.
Affiliations
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Corresponding author
Gallo, Francesca Romana
Venue
Phytochemical Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-10
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
550-559
ISSN
  • 0958-0344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1565
OpenAlex
W2084964445
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytochemical Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Chromatography in Natural Products
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Keywords
Lawsonia inermis, chemical fingerprinting, HPTLC densitometry, reversed-phase HPLC, herbal product quality control, adulteration detection, Indigofera tinctoria, methanol extraction
MeSH terms
Cassia, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Densitometry, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Plant Leaves, Indigofera, Lawsonia Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review