Cited by 22Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Cognitive self‐regulation and social functioning among French children: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade

Hubert, Blandine, Guimard, Philippe, Florin, Agnès·2017·PsyCh Journal

Abstract

This study adds to the body of research examining the links between two components of cognitive self-regulation (inhibitory control and verbal working memory) and social functioning (social integration, social problem solving, and prosocial skills) and focuses on children's sex as a moderator of the association between cognitive self-regulation and social functioning. The participants (N = 131) were French schoolchildren followed from kindergarten (Mage = 68.36 months, SD = 3.33 months) through Grade 1. Using hierarchical regression analyses, three major findings were revealed: (1) inhibitory control was a better predictor than verbal working memory of prosocial skills assessed by peers using the sociometric technique as well as by teachers using questionnaires, after controlling for sex, mother's education, and verbal and non-verbal IQ; (2) the prosocial skills assessed by teachers in kindergarten contributed more to explaining the prosocial skills and peer acceptance assessed in Grade 1 than cognitive self-regulation; and (3) sex did not moderate the relationship between cognitive self-regulation and social functioning. These results suggest that developing strong cognitive self-regulation, especially inhibitory control and prosocial skills, in young children schooled in France could be beneficial for their social development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pchj.160

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patterns across primary studies that have investigated childhood EF using canonical performance-based measures are difficult to discern, given mixed findings and large variation in sample sizes and effect sizes.

    “Patterns across primary studies that have investigated childhood EF using canonical performance-based measures are difficult to discern, given mixed findings and large variation in sample sizes and effect sizes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Hubert, B., Guimard, P., & Florin, A.
Affiliations
Université de Nantes (FR)
Corresponding author
Hubert, Blandine
Venue
PsyCh Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
57-75
ISSN
  • 2046-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-0260
OpenAlex
W2601770404
Cited by
22
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PsyCh Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
cognitive self-regulation, inhibitory control, verbal working memory, social functioning, prosocial skills, social integration, social problem solving, peer acceptance, sex differences, early childhood, kindergarten to first grade transition, French children
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, France, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review