The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review
Abstract
Embryonic aneuploidies may be responsible for pregnancy failure in many IVF patients. In recent years, fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) for multiple chromosomes has been used to document a high frequency of chromosomal errors and aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos and, after embryo biopsy, to select embryos that are more likely to implant. Such studies suggest that women with recurrent miscarriage and advanced maternal age may benefit most from preimplantation genetic diagnosis with aneuploidy screening (PGD‐AS). The success of PGD‐AS is likely to be enhanced by new technologies, such as comparative genomic hybridisation, which enable full karyotyping of single cells. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses
Braekeleer, M. D., & Dao, T.-N. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137135 · Cited by 272
Cited by
Thornhill, A. R., deDie-Smulders, C. E., Geraedts, J. P., Harper, J. C., Harton, G. L., Lavery, S. A., Moutou, C., Robinson, M. D., Schmutzler, A. G., Scriven, P. N., et al. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh579 · Cited by 455
Self-citationA Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices
Prasad, V., Vandross, A., Toomey, C., Cheung, M., Rho, J., Quinn, S., Chacko, S. J., Borkar, D., Gall, V., Selvaraj, S., et al. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.012 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilton, L.
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 512-518
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W2028645337
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
