Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing results in a patient subsequently diagnosed with metastatic disease

Osborne, C. Michael, Hardisty, Emily, Devers, Patricia, Kaiser‐Rogers, Kathleen, Hayden, Melissa A., Goodnight, William, Vora, Neeta L.·2013·Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract

What's already known about this topic? Noninvasive prenatal testing for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 is clinically available and is reported to have a false positive rate of 1% or less This technology utilizes massively parallel shotgun sequencing of cell‐free DNA, of maternal and placental origin, present in maternal plasma What does this study add? Unexplained abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing results should prompt consideration of a maternal source of the abnormal cell‐free DNA, such as malignancy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pd.4100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Osborne, C. M., Hardisty, E., Devers, P., Kaiser‐Rogers, K., Hayden, M. A., Goodnight, W., & Vora, N. L.
Venue
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
609-611
ISSN
  • 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0223
OpenAlex
W1499358940
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
26.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.