The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of targeted sequencing of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms for non‐invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y
Abstract
Objective: To assess the performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) testing in maternal blood for detection of fetal aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y using targeted sequencing of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms. Methods: Prospective study in 242 singleton pregnancies undergoing chorionic villus sampling at 11 to 13 weeks. Maternal blood was collected before chorionic villus sampling and sent to Natera (San Carlos, CA, USA). cfDNA was isolated from maternal plasma, and targeted multiplex PCR amplification followed by sequencing of 19 488 polymorphic loci covering chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was performed. Sequencing data were analyzed using the NATUS algorithm that determines the copy number and calculates a sample‐specific accuracy for each of the five chromosomes tested. Laboratory personnel were blinded to fetal karyotype. Results: Results were provided for 229 (94.6%) of the 242 cases. Thirty‐two cases were correctly identified as aneuploid, including trisomy 21 [n = 25; sensitivity = 100% (CI: 86.3–100%), specificity = 100% (CI: 98.2–100%)], trisomy 18 (n = 3), trisomy 13 (n = 1), Turner syndrome (n = 2), and triploidy (n = 1), with no false positive or false negative results. Median accuracy was 99.9% (range: 96.0–100%). Conclusions: cfDNA testing in maternal blood using targeted sequencing of polymorphic loci at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y holds promise for accurate detection of fetal autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and triploidy. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: Updated meta-analysis
Gil, M. M., Accurti, V., Santacruz, B., Plana, M. N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17484 · Cited by 683
Self-citationBenn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
Pergament, E., Cuckle, H., Zimmermann, B., Banjevic, M., Sigurjonsson, S., Ryan, A., Hall, M. P., Dodd, M., Lacroute, P., Stosic, M., et al. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000363 · Cited by 284
Dar, P., Curnow, K. J., Gross, S. J., Hall, M. P., Stosic, M., Demko, Z., Zimmermann, B., Hill, M., Sigurjonsson, S., Ryan, A., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.006 · Cited by 277
Lo, J. O., Feist, C. D., Norton, M. E., & Caughey, A. B. (2014) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000029 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolaides, K. H., Syngelaki, A., Gil, M., Atanasova, V., & Markova, D.
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 575-579
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W2098964174
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of targeted sequencing of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms for non‐invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pd.4103
- The paper
- Nicolaides, K. H., Syngelaki, A., Gil, M., Atanasova, V., & Markova, D. (2013). Validation of targeted sequencing of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms for non‐invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Prenatal Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.