The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies by massively parallel sequencing in a prospective Chinese population
Abstract
Objective: The recently developed noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) presents a new era of prenatal screening. Previously reported studies were primarily conducted on high‐risk and advanced maternal age (AMA) pregnancies. We sought to evaluate the performance of NIPT for detection of fetal aneuploidies in a Chinese cohort of women younger than 35 years old in a prospective clinical setting. Methods: Maternal plasma samples were sequenced to identify the aneuploidies. The results were compared against the serum screening results and validated by karyotyping through invasive procedures and birth follow‐up. Results: A total of 1916 prospectively collected maternal plasma samples were sequenced, among which 73 samples (3.8%) failed the sequencing quality control. Birth follow‐up missed 111 samples (5.8%). The remaining 1741 samples were analyzed. Sequencing reported 15 aneuploidy samples, including all the T21, T18, and T13 cases. Sequencing performed moderately in identifying sex chromosome aneuploidies, detecting two out of four samples, with a specificity of 99.88% (95% CI 99.53% to 99.98%). Conclusions: Noninvasive prenatal detection of common fetal aneuploidies is a more sensitive and specific method than triple maternal serum screening. It has a remarkable low false positive rate and is applicable to women younger than 35 years old. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: Updated meta-analysis
Gil, M. M., Accurti, V., Santacruz, B., Plana, M. N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17484 · Cited by 683
on behalf of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) and the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), Dondorp, W., de Wert, G., Bombard, Y., Bianchi, D. W., Bergmann, C., Borry, P., Chitty, L. S., Fellmann, F., Forzano, F., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.57 · Cited by 349
Benn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
Pergament, E., Cuckle, H., Zimmermann, B., Banjevic, M., Sigurjonsson, S., Ryan, A., Hall, M. P., Dodd, M., Lacroute, P., Stosic, M., et al. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000363 · Cited by 284
Thung, D. T., Beulen, L., Hehir-Kwa, J., & Faas, B. H. (2015) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2015.973857 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, Y., Liu, C., Qi, H., Zhang, Y., Bian, X., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 700-706
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W1499684505
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies by massively parallel sequencing in a prospective Chinese population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pd.4160
- The paper
- Song, Y., Liu, C., Qi, H., Zhang, Y., Bian, X., & Liu, J. (2013). Noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies by massively parallel sequencing in a prospective Chinese population. Prenatal Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.