The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A synthesis of oral morphine equivalents (OME) for opioid utilisation studies
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME) doses are increasingly being used as a metric to represent opioid use. Driven by a growing need from pharmacoepidemiological studies, the objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive OME conversion table that can be used by researchers to calculate OMEs in a consistent and systematic way. Methods: Clinical guidelines and literature sources were collated and synthesised to develop recommended OME conversion factors that can be used for research studies on opioids (including different formulations and routes of administration) currently available internationally including Australia, the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States and Canada. Results: No single resource includes all opioids that are currently available. Although there was some variation in conversion factors reported in different sources, overall, suggested conversion factors were mostly consistent across national and international sources. Conclusions: The use of the OME metric appears optimal for opioid utilisation studies as it facilities both interpretation and comparison between opioids and geographical locations. We have presented a synthesis of published OME conversion factors that can be applied to pharmacoepidemiological studies of opioids, in addition to a discussion of the considerations and caveats in using OME as a metric for opioid use. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain
Busse, J. W., Craigie, S., Juurlink, D. N., Buckley, D. N., Wang, L., Couban, R. J., Agoritsas, T., Akl, E. A., Carrasco-Labra, A., Cooper, L., et al. (2017) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.170363 · Cited by 707
Lepot, A., Elia, N., Tramèr, M. R., & Rehberg, B. (2021) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1648 · Cited by 16
Mörttinen-Vallius, H., Hartikainen, S., Seinelä, L., & Jämsen, E. (2021) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01627-8 · Cited by 10
Zhou, J., Calip, G. S., Rowan, S., McGregor, J. C., Perez, R. I., Evans, C. T., Gellad, W. F., & Suda, K. J. (2020) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2452 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, S., Degenhardt, L., Hoban, B., & Gisev, N.
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-22
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 733-737
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W2233361447
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A synthesis of oral morphine equivalents (OME) for opioid utilisation studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pds.3945
- The paper
- Nielsen, S., Degenhardt, L., Hoban, B., & Gisev, N. (2016). A synthesis of oral morphine equivalents (OME) for opioid utilisation studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.