The large strain compression, tension, and simple shear of polycarbonate

Abstract

Polymeric materials subjected to large strains undergo an evolution in molecular orientation. The developing orientation and corresponding strengthening are highly dependent on the state of strain. In this paper, we examine and compare the very different stress‐strain results of polycarbonate produced from four types of mechanical testing: uniaxial compression, plane strain compression, uniaxial tension, and simple shear. These tests produce different states of orientation within the material and, in the case of simple shear, the principle axes of orientation rotate during the deformation. The ability of the recent constitutive model of Arruda and Boyce (1992) to predict the to predict the observed behavior is evaluated. The model has been incoporated into a finite element code in order to properly simulate the material behavior during the inhomogenous deformations of tension (cold drawing) and simple shear. The material properties of the model are obtained from the uniaxial compression test and the model is then found to be truly predictive of the other states of deformation demonstrating its fully three dimensional capability. The disadvantages of the tensile and simple shear tests for obtaining the data needed to accurately quantify the large strain material behavior of polymers are shown and discussed.