A Three–Part Framework for Self–Regulated Personality Development across Adulthood
Abstract
Recently, researchers interested in personality development have begun to acknowledge the roles of motivation and self–regulation for why traits change across adulthood. We propose three preconditions under which individuals may change their own levels of a personality trait through self–directed efforts. Firstly, individuals need to desire changing their trait–related behaviours either as an end in itself or in order to achieve other goals. Secondly, they need to consider behavioural changes feasible and be able to implement the desired changes. Thirdly, behavioural changes need to become habitual in order to constitute a stable trait. After elaborating on these three conditions, we review evidence attesting to the importance of motivation and self–regulation for trait development. We conclude with a discussion of the mutual interdependence of traits and goals, as well as the limits of self–regulated personality change. From our framework, we derive why personality changes across adulthood tend to be small to medium only, namely because they may require that all three preconditions for self–regulated personality change are fulfilled. We provide reasons for why people might not view change as desirable, feasible or fail to maintain it over time. Finally, we propose ideas for potential study designs to research self–regulated personality change. Copyright © 2014 European Association of Personality Psychology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-determined plans and activities may result in change in personality traits, albeit usually modest change.
“Their self determined plans and activities may indeed result in change in personality traits, albeit usually modest change (Hennecke et al., 2014;Wrzus & Roberts, 2017).”
From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as Hennecke et al., 2014
Changes in response to life events likely unfold in a slow and incremental way over relatively long periods of time.
“Specifically, changes in response to life events likely unfold in a slow and incremental way over relatively long periods of time”
From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Hennecke, Bleidorn, Denissen, & Wood, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 201
- Authors
- Hennecke, M., Bleidorn, W., Denissen, J. J. A., & Wood, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hennecke, Marie
- Venue
- European Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-299
- ISSN
- 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0984
- OpenAlex
- W2171467662
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SP 1462/1-1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- motivation, self-regulation, trait change, habituation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review