The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Compostability of polymers
Abstract
In recent years, biobased polymers have gained attention from industries, consumers and governments as a way to reduce municipal solid waste. Much attention has been given to their production and implementation. However, these materials only reach their potential environmental benefits when they are recovered through recycling or composting and/or their energy is recovered by incineration. These end‐of‐life scenarios allow closing the carbon cycle loop. A lot of confusion and misunderstanding about these new materials and their end‐of‐life scenarios, particularly composting, have been generated. This paper addresses definitions and environmental performance of these materials and their compostability. Current methods for measuring biobased content and biodegradability of polymers and factors affecting it, such as exposure conditions and polymer characteristics, are discussed, and the use of life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the environmental performance of biopolymers is presented. Although there are some obstacles for the growth and implementation of biobased polymers, such as consumer adoption and available composting facilities accepting these materials, new opportunities are growing due to government regulation and business initiatives in the past five years. However, consumers' understanding of when the use of these materials provides environmental benefits and when not is still missing. Therefore, to adopt and to implement these new biopolymers cooperative work among industry, consumers and government is needed. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review
Kasirajan, S., & Ngouajio, M. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3 · Cited by 1,353
Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics
Mohanan, N., Montazer, Z., Sharma, P. K., & Levin, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.580709 · Cited by 1,122
Biodegradable plastic agricultural mulches and key features of microbial degradation
Brodhagen, M., Peyron, M., Miles, C., & Inglis, D. A. (2015) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-6267-5 · Cited by 267
Chemical recycling of poly(lactic acid) via controlled degradation with protic (macro)molecules
Plichta, A., Lisowska, P., Kundys, A., Zychewicz, A., Dębowski, M., & Florjańczyk, Z. (2014) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.006 · Cited by 53
Dharmalingam, S., Hayes, D. G., Wadsworth, L. C., & Dunlap, R. N. (2016) · Textile Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0040517515612358 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kijchavengkul, T., & Auras, R.
- Venue
- Polymer International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-31
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 793-804
- ISSN
- 0959-8103 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0126
- OpenAlex
- W2049459531
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compostability of polymers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pi.2420
- The paper
- Kijchavengkul, T., & Auras, R. (2008). Compostability of polymers. Polymer International. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.