Cited by 13biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

Short poly(ethylene glycol) block initiation of poly(l‐lactide) di‐block copolymers: a strategy for tuning the degradation of resorbable devices

Open access
Azhari, Zein, McMahon, Sean, Pierucci, Luca, Wang, Wenxin, Cameron, Ruth E·2018·Polymer International

Abstract

The current range of medical applications of resorbable polyesters could be hugely expanded if more effective strategies for tailoring degradation rate were available. Block copolymerisation with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) has been shown to reduce degradation times; however, to date, this has relied on the addition of PEG to short lengths of polyester. This results in copolymers with high fractions of PEG and low molecular weights, reducing the potential range of applications. Furthermore, there has been no systematic study of the relative lengths of the blocks. In this work, we employed short hydroxyl‐functionalised methoxy‐terminated mPEG to initiate the synthesis of poly(l‐lactide) (PLLA), resulting in controlled di‐block copolymers with short mPEG blocks and long PLLA blocks. A controlled series of polymers was made with PLLA lengths (60 < Mn (kg mol−1) < 200) and mPEG lengths (550 < Mn (g mol−1) < 5000) giving very low mPEG content (0.1–1.5 wt%). We found that, despite the low fraction of mPEG, water uptake and the rate of hydrolytic degradation, k, increased. Significantly, k for the polymers was dependent only on the presence of mPEG, and was little affected by mPEG length or PLLA length in the ranges studied. Moreover, mass loss began in all polymers when Mn of the polymer fell below a threshold of about 20 kg mol−1 and depended on both the initial molecular weight of PLLA and the presence (but not the length) of mPEG. Short‐chain mPEG therefore provides a new route for targeted, temporal control of resorbable polyesters for biomedical devices. © 2018 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pi.5563

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azhari, Z., McMahon, S., Pierucci, L., Wang, W., & Cameron, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Vornia Biomaterials Ltd Synergy Centre Tallaght Dublin Ireland
  • Vornia (Ireland) (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Wenxin
  • Cameron, Ruth E
Venue
Polymer International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-02
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
726-738
ISSN
  • 0959-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0126
OpenAlex
W2801623923
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymer International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Irish Research Council (EBPPG/2014/70)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L504920/1)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (604251)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers, poly(L-lactic acid), diblock copolymers, water absorption, degradation rate control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review