Biodegradable polymer films: processability, technological properties and their viability for flexible packaging applications
Open accessAbstract
Nowadays, there is a rising interest in the packaging industry regarding more environment‐friendly (i.e. biodegradable and/or compostable) polymer‐based solutions, especially for film blowing applications. However, replacing traditional, fossil resource‐based polymers typically used for such applications is not an easy task, since the more environment‐friendly solutions must have adequate features in terms of processability and final properties. In this work, three commercial biodegradable (and, at least partially, biobased) polymers were investigated by a preliminary rheological and mechanical analysis, in order to perform film manufacturing experiments in laboratory equipment. Furthermore, oxygen and water vapour barrier properties were studied by permeability measurements. The investigation was ultimately performed on films produced in industrial equipment, and the results were compared to those for a typical, standard polypropylene (PP) film used in flexible packaging applications. It was found that the mechanical properties were adequate (in some cases, even up to 25–30% higher than for the PP counterpart), as well as oxygen permeability. On the other hand, water permeability was significantly higher than that of PP films, and this should be taken into account in cases where high water vapour barrier properties are required. © 2024 Society of Industrial Chemistry.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Morreale, M., Baiamonte, M., Correnti, A., Messina, S., & La Mantia, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
- National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT)
- Joeplast SpA Casteltermini Italy
- National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM) Florence Italy
- ORCID
- Morreale, Marco
- Venue
- Polymer International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-03-27
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 603-611
- ISSN
- 0959-8103 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0126
- OpenAlex
- W4392705077
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Polymer International (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Regione Siciliana
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Keywords
- biodegradable polymers, bio-based polymers, polymer films, film blowing, flexible packaging, processability, rheology, mechanical properties, oxygen permeability, water vapor barrier, polypropylene film, compostable packaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review