The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photovoltaic module reliability model based on field degradation studies
Open accessAbstract
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules are often stated as being the most reliable element in PV systems. This presumable high reliability is reflected by their long power warranty periods. In agreement with these long warranty times, PV modules have a very low total number of returns, the exceptions usually being the result of catastrophic failures. Up to now, failures resulting from degradation are not typically taken into consideration because of the difficulties in measuring the power of an individual module in a system. However, lasting recent years PV systems are changing from small isolated systems to large grid‐connected power stations. In this new scenario, customers will become more sensitive to power losses and the need for a reliability model based on degradation may become of utmost importance. In this paper, a PV module reliability model based on degradation studies is presented. The main analytical functions of reliability engineering are evaluated using this model and applied to a practical case, based on state‐of‐the‐art parameters of crystalline silicon PV technology. Relevant and defensible power warranties and other reliability data are obtained with this model based on measured degradation rates and time‐dependent power variability. In the derivation of the model some assumptions are made about the future behaviour of the products—i.e. linear degradation rates—although the approach can be used for other assumed functional profiles as well. The method documented in this paper explicitly shows manufacturers how to make reasonable and sensible warranty projections. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review
Jordan, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2013) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/pip.1182 · Cited by 1,529
Compendium of photovoltaic degradation rates
Jordan, D. C., Kurtz, S. R., VanSant, K., & Newmiller, J. (2016) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/pip.2744 · Cited by 556
Sustainability of integrated energy systems: a performance-based resilience assessment methodology
Moslehi, S., & Reddy, T. A. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.075 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Vázquez, M., & Rey‐Stolle, I.
- Venue
- Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 419-433
- ISSN
- 1062-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-159X
- OpenAlex
- W1994113540
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photovoltaic module reliability model based on field degradation studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pip.825
- The paper
- Vázquez, M., & Rey‐Stolle, I. (2008). Photovoltaic module reliability model based on field degradation studies. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.