The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ex‐ante environmental and economic evaluation of polymer photovoltaics
Open accessAbstract
The use of polymer materials for photovoltaic applications is expected to have several advantages over current crystalline silicon technology. In this paper, we perform an environmental and economic assessment of polymer‐based thin film modules with a glass substrate and modules with a flexible substrate and we compare our results with literature data for multicrystalline (mc‐) silicon photovoltaics and other types of PV. The functional unit of this study is ‘25 years of electricity production by PV systems with a power of 1 watt‐peak (W p)’. Because the lifetime of polymer photovoltaics is at present much lower than of mc‐silicon photovoltaics, we first compared the PV cells per watt‐peak and next determined the minimum required lifetime of polymer PV to arrive at the same environmental impacts as mc‐silicon PV. We found that per watt‐peak of output power, the environmental impacts compared to mc‐silicon are 20–60% lower for polymer PV systems with glass substrate and 80–95% lower for polymer PV with PET as substrate (flexible modules). Also in comparison with thin film CuInSe and thin film silicon, the impacts of polymer modules, per watt‐peak, appeared to be lower. The costs per watt‐peak of polymer PV modules with glass substrate are approximately 20% higher compared to mc‐silicon photovoltaics. However, taking into account uncertainties, this might be an overestimation. For flexible modules, no cost data were available. If the efficiency and lifetime of polymer PV modules increases, both glass‐based and flexible polymer PV could become an environment friendly and cheap alternative to mc‐silicon PV. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advantages, challenges and molecular design of different material types used in organic solar cells
Yi, J., Zhang, G., Yu, H., & Yan, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00618-1 · Cited by 522
The case for organic photovoltaics
Darling, S. B., & You, F. (2013) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c3ra42989j · Cited by 508
Recent progress in non-fullerene small molecule acceptors in organic solar cells (OSCs)
Chen, W., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c6tc05066b · Cited by 407
Espinosa, N., García-Valverde, R., Urbina, A., & Krebs, F. C. (2011) · Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells · doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.020 · Cited by 342
Material and Energy Intensity of Fullerene Production
Anctil, A., Babbitt, C. W., Raffaelle, R. P., & Landi, B. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103860a · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Roes, A. L., Alsema, E. A., Blok, K., & Patel, M. K.
- Venue
- Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 372-393
- ISSN
- 1062-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-159X
- OpenAlex
- W2060521667
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ex‐ante environmental and economic evaluation of polymer photovoltaics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pip.891
- The paper
- Roes, A. L., Alsema, E. A., Blok, K., & Patel, M. K. (2009). Ex‐ante environmental and economic evaluation of polymer photovoltaics. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.