Test Anxiety Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Treatment Studies from 2000–2010
Abstract
High‐stakes tests have played an increasingly important role in how student achievement and school effectiveness are measured. Test anxiety has risen with the use of tests in educational decision making. Students with high test anxiety perform poorly on tests when compared to students with low test anxiety. School psychologists can play an important role as experts both in tests and measurement and mental health in providing consultation and treatment for students with test anxiety. This article describes the results of a systematic literature review of the last 10 years of test‐anxiety interventions. Results indicate that there are few studies that have examined test‐anxiety interventions with elementary and secondary school students. However, techniques including biofeedback, behavior therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, priming competency, and mixed approaches have demonstrated promising results. Suggestions are made for school psychologists for the delivery of evidenced‐based test anxiety interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the existing treatment interventions for adolescents' test anxiety encompassed a structured psychotherapeutic program.
“none encompassed a structured psychotherapeutic program, which predicts stronger treatment outcomes (Cummings et al., 2013).”
From THE EFFICACY OF A COMPASSION, ACCEPTANCE AND MINDFULNESS-BASED PILOT INTERVENTION FOR ADOLESCENTS’ TEST ANXIETY: A CASE STUDY USING THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM (2023) · cites this paper as von der Embse et al., 2013
Treatment interventions for adolescents' test anxiety in the last two decades have pointed to either cognitive-behavioural conceptualization and techniques, or solely to academic skills training.
“Treatment interventions for adolescents' TA in the last two decades have also pointed to either cognitivebehavioural conceptualization and techniques, or solely to academic skills training.”
From THE EFFICACY OF A COMPASSION, ACCEPTANCE AND MINDFULNESS-BASED PILOT INTERVENTION FOR ADOLESCENTS’ TEST ANXIETY: A CASE STUDY USING THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM (2023) · cites this paper as von der Embse et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- von der Embse, N., Barterian, J., & Segool, N.
- Affiliations
- East Carolina University
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Hartford (US)
- Venue
- Psychology in the Schools
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-20
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-71
- ISSN
- 0033-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6807
- OpenAlex
- W2126737700
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology in the Schools (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- test anxiety, children, adolescents, high-stakes testing, school psychologists, biofeedback, behavior therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, evidence-based interventions, school consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review