Facilitators and barriers to African American high school students' self‐determination skill expression
Abstract
We conducted four focus group interviews with 24 high school youth to examine facilitators and barriers to African American high school students' expression of various self‐determination skills (e.g., choice/decision making, self‐advocacy, goal setting, and attainment etc.). The majority of our research participants were African American, with one student identifying as multiracial (African American and White). Key findings revealed that personal (e.g., desire to graduate from school) and contextual factors (e.g., school counselor and teacher support) influenced the participants' expression of multiple self‐determination skills. We also found that some of the participants' motives for utilizing or not utilizing specific skills were influenced by what they perceived as racist, punitive, and restrictive school practices (e.g., teachers holding negative perceptions about African American students and school counselors restricting their access to advanced courses). Findings from this study support ongoing calls for educators to consider students' cultural backgrounds and lived experiences when promoting their expression of self‐determination skills.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HBS functions as a symbolic bridge toward life beyond hospitalization.
“our findings demonstrate that HBS functions as a symbolic bridge toward life beyond hospitalization.”
From Sense of School Belonging and School Reintegration for Students Hospitalized With Chronic or Complex Medical Diseases: Insights From a Grounded Theory Study (2026) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133 · see citing works
Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
Tracy, S. J. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410383121 · Cited by 7,536 · see citing works
How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x16639015 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
The Achievement Gap and the Discipline Gap: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09357621 · Cited by 1,395 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parker, J. S., Parris, L. N., Lau, M., Dobbins, A., Shatz, L., Porush, S., & Wilkins, B. (2021) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984211009190 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation“This School Helps A Lot”: Personal Agency Among Black Youth Within a Supportive School Environment
Parker, J. S., Marano, E., Manson, D., Ruja, E., Manigo, C., Sarathy, A., Rees, B., & Shin, E. (2021) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/s11256-021-00626-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Regarding the latter, the first and third author of this paper began the analysis process by reviewing the codes, themes, and categories from our research team’s prior studies (Parker et al., 2020a, 2020b) to facilitate a shared understanding of identified barriers and facilitators.”
MethodSelf-citationGoldie, P. D., Placide, B., & Grapin, S. L. (2025) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-025-00549-4
“Lastly, Parker et al. (2020) reported that restrictive school practices related to race (e.g., systematically discouraging African American students from taking advanced courses) hindered these students’ academic self-determination and goals.”
Exploring the impacts of the Rebel mascot: insights gained from school-based helping professionals
Davis, E. S., Lancaster, C., & Topdemir, C. (2023) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2023.2192951 · Cited by 1
“…helping professionals in education can begin conversations with other school stake-holders about topics of privilege and racism to foster environments where biases can be acknowledged, challenged, and discussed openly without fear of negative repercussions (Cook et al. 2019; Parker et al. 2020).”
Tomberli, L., Vagnoli, L., Pavone, L., Amore, E., & Ciucci, E. (2026) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.70176
Feuer, B. R., Toste, J. R., Shogren, K. A., & Hart, E. J. (2026) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029261471336
Decision Making and Culturally Diverse Individuals with IDD and Their Families: A Call for Research
Vanegas, S. B., Magaña, S., Zeng, W., & Pavon, C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74675-9_10 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parker, J. S., Amabile, A., Oliver, E., Garnes, J., & Sarathy, A.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Janise S.
- ORCID
- Parker, Janise S.
- Venue
- Psychology in the Schools
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-04-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1289-1308
- ISSN
- 0033-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6807
- OpenAlex
- W3015054904
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology in the Schools (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- William & Mary Summer Faculty Research Award
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Keywords
- self-determination skills, self-advocacy, goal setting, attainment, teacher support, racism in schools, multiracial students, student motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review