CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Child Abuse and TraumaSocial Work Education and PracticeTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mitigating secondary traumatic stress in preservice educators: A pilot study on the role of trauma‐informed practice seminars

Castro Schepers, Ofelia, Young, Kathryn S.·2022·Psychology in the Schools
DOI 10.1002/pits.22610
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract In this study, explore secondary traumatic stress (STS) in preservice teachers (PSTs) and if trauma‐informed practices (TIPs) have the potential to mitigate STS. We hypothesize that PST who have had consistent and extensive exposure to TIP will experience lower levels of STS in their student teaching or residency than students who have not had this exposure. Thirty‐four PST participated in the study. Twenty‐one were women, 12 men, and 1 identified as nonbinary. Their average age was 31 years. Participants were 73.1% Caucasian. A survey design was used. Surveys went out to all Metropolitan State University of Denver School of Education Students. Early results demonstrate a positive causal relationship between an increase of TIP seminars and decreased STS. By integrating TIP seminars and principles into teacher preparation programs, new teachers will enter the workforce better equipped to address their own needs and the needs of the children and families they serve.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pits.22610

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.3102/0034654320938131 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00131880600732314 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/1754730X.2012.664862 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/1754730X.2015.1080123 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/00098650009599442 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/016146811711900401 · DOI
  7. Figley C. R., 1995, Secondary traumatic stress: Self‐care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators, 3
  8. 10.1007/s12310-019-09318-0 · DOI
  9. Gold Y., 1993, Teachers managing stress & preventing burnout
  10. Harvey J., 2014, Getting beyond the blame game, Educational Leadership, 71, 24
  11. 10.12698/cpre.2011.rr69 · DOI
  12. Johnson S. M., 2006, Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools
  13. 10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.006 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/17425964.2020.1783527 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/15377903.2012.695767 · DOI
  16. Salston M. & Figley C. R. (2003). Secondary traumatic stress effects of working with survivors of criminal victimization.Journal of Trauma Stress (2) 167–174.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022899207206 · DOI
  17. Schepers O.(2017).A teacher at risk: Giving voice to teacher secondary traumatic stress(Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado Boulder.https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/3x816m761
  18. 10.1177/016146811511700305 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/trm0000180 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/pits.22329 · DOI
  21. 10.4018/978-1-7998-2971-3.ch011 · DOI
  22. Tehrani N. (2007). The cost of caring–The impact of secondary trauma on assumptions values and beliefs.Counselling Psychology Quarterly 20(4) 325–339.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070701690069 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/occmed/kqp174 · DOI
  24. Ting L. Jacobson J. M. Sanders S. Bride B. E. & Harrington D. (2005). The Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS).Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 11 177–194. · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005 · DOI
  26. Watson A., 2015, Recruiting and retaining educators of color
  27. Weems G. H., 2001, The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data, measurement and evaluation, Counseling and Development, 34, 166
  28. Williams M., 2018, Social and emotional learning strategies in the elementary classroom and their impact on student success, School of Education Student Capstone Projects, 232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study

    Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-8 · Cited by 48

    “…principles of safety, trustworthiness, peer support collaboration and mutuality, empowerment, and cultural, historical and gender issues (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014) and is shown to reduce STS and burnout amongst staff (Handran, 2015; Schepers & Young, 2022).”
    Background

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Castro Schepers, O., & Young, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Elementary Education and Literacy Metropolitan State University of Denver Denver Colorado USA
  • Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychology in the Schools
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
316-333
ISSN
  • 0033-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6807
DOI
10.1002/pits.22610
OpenAlex
W3209609556
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Psychology in the Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
secondary traumatic stress, pre-service teachers, trauma-informed practice, teacher education curriculum, student teaching, teacher well-being, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review