The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
To maximize overall fitness, plants must accurately respond to a host of growth, developmental, and environmental signals throughout their life. Many of these internal and external signals are perceived by the leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like kinases, which play roles in regulating growth, development, and immunity. This largest family of receptor kinases in plants can be divided into subfamilies based on the conservation of the kinase domain, which demonstrates that shared evolutionary history often indicates shared molecular function. Here we investigate the evolutionary history of this family across the evolution of 112 plant species. We identify lineage‐specific expansions of the malectin‐domain containing subfamily LRR subfamily I primarily in the Brassicales and bryophytes. Most other plant lineages instead show a large expansion in LRR subfamily XII, which in Arabidopsis is known to contain key receptors in pathogen perception. This striking asymmetric expansion may reveal a dichotomy in the evolutionary history and adaptation strategies employed by plants. A greater understanding of the evolutionary pressures and adaptation strategies acting on members of this receptor family offers a way to improve functional predictions for orphan receptors and simplify the identification of novel stress‐related receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., & Minh, B. Q. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu300 · Cited by 26,046
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A., & Jermiin, L. S. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4285 · Cited by 18,449
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x · Cited by 9,277
Pfam: The protein families database in 2021
Mistry, J., Chuguransky, S., Williams, L., Qureshi, M., Salazar, G. A., Sonnhammer, E. L. L., Tosatto, S. C. E., Paladin, L., Raj, S., Richardson, L. J., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · Cited by 7,452
Accelerated Profile HMM Searches
Eddy, S. R. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · Cited by 6,975
Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics
Goodstein, D. M., Shu, S., Howson, R. W., Neupane, R., Hayes, R. D., Fazo, J., Mitros, T., Dirks, W., Hellsten, U., Putnam, N. H., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr944 · Cited by 5,533
Metadata
- Authors
- Kileeg, Z., Haldar, A., Khan, H., Qamar, A., & Mott, G. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mott, G. Adam
- Venue
- Plant Direct
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e556-e556
- ISSN
- 2475-4455 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10739070
- OpenAlex
- W4390110941
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases, gene family expansion, plant evolution, Brassicales, bryophytes, pathogen perception, orphan receptors, plant immunity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pld3.556
- The paper
- Kileeg, Z., Haldar, A., Khan, H., Qamar, A., & Mott, G. A. (2023). Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution. Plant Direct. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.