Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An approach to remove albumin for the proteomic analysis of low abundance biomarkers in human serum

Ahmed, Nuzhat, Barker, Gillian, Oliva, Karen, Garfin, David, Talmadge, Kenneth, Georgiou, Harry, Quinn, Michael, Rice, Greg·2003·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Proteomic technologies are being used to discover and identify disease‐associated biomarkers. The application of these technologies in the search for potential diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers in the serum of patients has been limited by the presence of highly abundant albumin and immunoglobulins that constitute approximately 60–97% of the total serum proteins. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether treatment of human serum with Affi‐Gel Blue alone or in combination with Protein A (Aurum serum protein mini kit, Bio‐Rad) before two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DE) analysis removed high abundance proteins to allow the visualization of low abundant proteins. Serum samples were treated with either Affi‐Gel Blue or Aurum kit and then subjected to 2‐DE using 11 cm, pH 4–7 isoelectric focussing strips for the first dimension and 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for second dimension. Protein spots were visualized using a fluorescent protein dye (SYPRO Ruby, Bio‐Rad). Comparison between treatment methods showed significant removal of albumin by both Affi‐Gel Blue and Aurum kit and considerable differences in the protein profile of the gels after each treatment. Direct comparison between treatments revealed twenty‐eight protein spots unique to Affi‐Gel Blue while only two spots were unique after Aurum kit treatment. Unique spots in Affi‐Gel Blue and Aurum kit treated serum were not visualized in untreated serum. Sixteen hours of Affi‐Gel Blue treatment resulted in enhanced visualization of fifty‐three protein spots by two‐fold, thirty‐one by five‐fold, twelve by ten‐fold and six by twenty‐fold. In parallel after Aurum kit treatment two‐, five‐, ten‐ and twenty‐fold enhancements of thirty, thirteen, eight and five protein spots, respectively, were observed. The pattern of increased visualization of protein spots with both treatment methods was similar. In conclusion, treatment of serum samples with Affi‐Gel Blue or Aurum kit before 2‐DE analysis can be used to remove high abundance proteins in order to increase the detection sensitivity of proteins present in low abundance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200300465

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Ahmed, N., Barker, G., Oliva, K., Garfin, D., Talmadge, K., Georgiou, H., Quinn, M., & Rice, G.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
1980-1987
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2088261915
Cited by
197
References
1
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An approach to remove albumin for the proteomic analysis of low abundance biomarkers in human serum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200300465
The paper
Ahmed, N., Barker, G., Oliva, K., Garfin, D., Talmadge, K., Georgiou, H., Quinn, M., & Rice, G. (2003). An approach to remove albumin for the proteomic analysis of low abundance biomarkers in human serum. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300465

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.