Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 924

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel experimental design for comparative two‐dimensional gel analysis: Two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard

Alban, Andrew, David, Stephen Olu, Bjorkesten, Lennart, Andersson, Christian, Sloge, Erik, Lewis, Steve, Currie, Ian·2003·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

The comparison of two‐dimensional (2‐D) gel images from different samples is an established method used to study differences in protein expression. Conventional methods rely on comparing images from at least 2 different gels. Due to the high variation between gels, detection and quantification of protein differences can be problematic. Two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (Ettan™ DIGE) is an emerging technique for comparative proteomics, which improves the reproducibility and reliability of differential protein expression analysis between samples. In the application of DIGE different samples are labelled with mass and charge matched spectrally resolvable fluorescent dyes and are then separated on the same 2‐D gel. Using an Escherichia coli lysate “spiked” with varying amounts of four different known proteins, we have tested a novel experimental design that exploits the sample multiplexing capabilities of DIGE, by including a standard sample in each gel. The standard sample comprises equal amounts of each sample to be compared and was found to improve the accuracy of protein quantification between samples from different gels allowing accurate detection of small differences in protein levels between samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200390006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 924

Metadata

Authors
Alban, A., David, S. O., Bjorkesten, L., Andersson, C., Sloge, E., Lewis, S., & Currie, I.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
36-44
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2075241233
Cited by
924
References
1
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel experimental design for comparative two‐dimensional gel analysis: Two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200390006
The paper
Alban, A., David, S. O., Bjorkesten, L., Andersson, C., Sloge, E., Lewis, S., & Currie, I. (2003). A novel experimental design for comparative two‐dimensional gel analysis: Two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200390006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.