The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomic analysis of salt stress‐responsive proteins in rice root
Abstract
Salt stress is one of the major abiotic stresses in agriculture worldwide. We report here a systematic proteomic approach to investigate the salt stress‐responsive proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare). Three‐week‐old seedlings were treated with 150 m M NaCl for 24, 48 and 72 h. Total proteins of roots were extracted and separated by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis. More than 1100 protein spots were reproducibly detected, including 34 that were up‐regulated and 20 down‐regulated. Mass spectrometry analysis and database searching helped us to identify 12 spots representing 10 different proteins. Three spots were identified as the same protein, enolase. While four of them were previously confirmed as salt stress‐responsive proteins, six are novel ones, i.e. UDP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6b‐1, glutamine synthetase root isozyme, putative nascent polypeptide associated complex alpha chain, putative splicing factor‐like protein and putative actin‐binding protein. These proteins are involved in regulation of carbohydrate, nitrogen and energy metabolism, reactive oxygen species scavenging, mRNA and protein processing, and cytoskeleton stability. This study gives new insights into salt stress response in rice roots and demonstrates the power of the proteomic approach in plant biology studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hernández, J. A., Jiménez, A., Mullineaux, P., & Sevilia, F. (2000) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00602.x · Cited by 837
Cited by
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2011) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 · Cited by 852
Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms – getting genomics going
Bohnert, H. J., Gong, Q., Li, P., & Ma, S. (2006) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.003 · Cited by 434
Nitrogen Journey in Plants: From Uptake to Metabolism, Stress Response, and Microbe Interaction
Zayed, O., Hewedy, O. A., Abdelmoteleb, A., Ali, M., Youssef, M. S., Roumia, A. F., Seymour, D., & Yuan, Z.-C. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13101443 · Cited by 412
Mechanisms of Plant Salt Response: Insights from Proteomics
Zhang, H., Han, B., Wang, T., Chen, S., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Dai, S. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200861w · Cited by 377
Abiotic stress responses in plant roots: a proteomics perspective
Ghosh, D., & Xu, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00006 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, S., Tang, Z., Su, W., & Sun, W.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 235-244
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2100027593
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic analysis of salt stress‐responsive proteins in rice root. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200400853
- The paper
- Yan, S., Tang, Z., Su, W., & Sun, W. (2005). Proteomic analysis of salt stress‐responsive proteins in rice root. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.