The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large‐scale analysis of the human ubiquitin‐related proteome
Abstract
Protein ubiquitylation contributes to the regulation of many cellular processes including protein degradation, receptor internalization, and repair of DNA damage. We now present a comprehensive characterization of ubiquitin‐conjugated and ubiquitin‐associated proteins in human cells. The proteins were purified by immunoaffinity chromatography under denaturing or native conditions. They were then digested with trypsin, and the resulting peptides were analyzed by 2‐D LC and MS/MS. A total of 670 distinct proteins were identified; 345 proteins (51%) were classified as Urp‐D (ubiquitin‐related proteome under the denaturing condition) and comprised ubiquitin‐conjugated molecules, whereas 325 proteins (49%) were classified as Urp‐N (ubiquitin‐related proteome only under the native condition) and included molecules that associated with ubiquitylated proteins. The proportions of proteins in various functional categories differed substantially between Urp‐D and Urp‐N. Many ribosomal subunits were detected in the Urp‐D group of proteins and several of these subunits were directly shown to be ubiquitylated by mass spectrometric analysis, suggesting that ubiquitylation might play an important role in the regulation and/or quality control of ribosomal proteins. Our results demonstrate the potential of proteomics analysis of protein ubiquitylation to provide important insight into the regulation of protein stability and other ubiquitin‐related cellular functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deng, L., Wang, C., Spencer, E., Yang, L., Braun, A., You, J., Slaughter, C., Pickart, C., & Chen, Z. J. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00126-4 · Cited by 1,872
Cited by
Systematic and Quantitative Assessment of the Ubiquitin-Modified Proteome
Kim, W., Bennett, E. J., Huttlin, E. L., Guo, A., Li, J., Possemato, A., Sowa, M. E., Rad, R., Rush, J., Comb, M. J., et al. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.025 · Cited by 1,613
Gibbings, D. J., Ciaudo, C., Erhardt, M., & Voinnet, O. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1929 · Cited by 991
Zhao, Y., & Jensen, O. N. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900398 · Cited by 384
Analysis of Nucleolar Protein Dynamics Reveals the Nuclear Degradation of Ribosomal Proteins
Lam, Y. W., Lamond, A. I., Mann, M., & Andersen, J. S. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.064 · Cited by 369
Exosomes as nucleic acid nanocarriers
van den Boorn, J. G., Daßler, J., Coch, C., Schlee, M., & Hartmann, G. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.011 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumoto, M., Hatakeyama, S., Oyamada, K., Oda, Y., Nishimura, T., & Nakayama, K. I.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4145-4151
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2073454559
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale analysis of the human ubiquitin‐related proteome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401280
- The paper
- Matsumoto, M., Hatakeyama, S., Oyamada, K., Oda, Y., Nishimura, T., & Nakayama, K. I. (2005). Large‐scale analysis of the human ubiquitin‐related proteome. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.