Proteomics for the analysis of the Candida albicans biofilm lifestyle
Abstract
Candida albicans is an opportunistic pathogenic fungus capable of causing infections in immunocompromised patients. Candidiasis is often associated with the formation of biofilms on the surface of inert or biological materials. Biofilms are structured microbial communities attached to a surface and encased within a matrix of exopolymeric substance (EPS). At present, very little is known about the changes in protein profiles that occur during the transition from the planktonic to the biofilm mode of growth. Here, we report the use of proteomics for the comparative analysis of subcellular fractions obtained from C. albicans biofilm and planktonic cultures, including cell surface‐associated proteins and secreted components present in liquid culture supernatants (for planktonic cultures) and EPS (for biofilms). The analysis revealed a high degree of similarity between the protein profiles associated with the planktonic and biofilm extracts, and led to the identification of several differentially expressed protein spots. Among the differentially expressed proteins, there was a preponderance of metabolic enzymes that have been described as cell surface proteins and immunodominant antigens. Proteins found in the biofilm matrix included a few predicted to form part of the secretome, and also many secretion‐signal‐less proteins. These observations contribute to our understanding of the C. albicans biofilm lifestyle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many hundreds of mRNAs and proteins are differentially expressed between biofilms and planktonic cells.
“These studies have revealed that many hundreds of mRNAs and proteins are differentially expressed between biofilms and planktonic cells.”
From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [191]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Thomas, D. P., Bachmann, S. P., & Lopez‐Ribot, J. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- ORCID
- Thomas, Derek P.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 5795-5804
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2059410976
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA054174, CA-54174)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R21DE015079)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- Candida albicans, biofilm, exopolysaccharide matrix, cell surface proteins, secretome, differentially expressed proteins, subcellular fractionation, candidiasis, opportunistic fungal pathogens, immunodominant antigens
- MeSH terms
- Candida albicans, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Peptide Mapping, Plankton, Mass Spectrometry, Subcellular Fractions, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Biofilms, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review