Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved recovery of proteome‐informative, protein N‐terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography (COFRADIC)

Open access
Staes, An, Van Damme, Petra, Helsens, Kenny, Demol, Hans, Vandekerckhove, Joël, Gevaert, Kris·2008·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

We previously described a proteome‐wide, peptide‐centric procedure for sorting protein N‐terminal peptides and used these peptides as readouts for protease degradome and xenoproteome studies. This procedure is part of a repertoire of gel‐free techniques known as COmbined FRActional DIagonal Chromatography (COFRADIC) and highly enriches for α‐amino‐blocked peptides, including α‐amino‐acetylated protein N‐terminal peptides. Here, we introduce two additional steps that significantly increase the fraction of such proteome‐informative, N‐terminal peptides: strong cation exchange (SCX) segregation of α‐amino‐blocked and α‐amino‐free peptides and an enzymatic step liberating pyroglutamyl peptides for 2,4,6‐trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNBS) modification and thus COFRADIC sorting. The SCX step reduces the complexity of the analyte mixture by enriching N‐terminal peptides and depleting α‐amino‐free internal peptides as well as proline‐starting peptides prior to COFRADIC. The action of pyroglutamyl aminopeptidases prior to the first COFRADIC peptide separation results in greatly diminishing numbers of contaminating pyroglutamyl peptides in peptide maps. We further show that now close to 95% of all COFRADIC‐sorted peptides are α‐amino‐acetylated and, using the same amount of starting material, our novel procedure leads to an increased number of protein identifications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200700950

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Staes, A., Van Damme, P., Helsens, K., Demol, H., Vandekerckhove, J., & Gevaert, K.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1362-1370
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W1980745149
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved recovery of proteome‐informative, protein N‐terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography (COFRADIC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200700950
The paper
Staes, A., Van Damme, P., Helsens, K., Demol, H., Vandekerckhove, J., & Gevaert, K. (2008). Improved recovery of proteome‐informative, protein N‐terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography (COFRADIC). PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700950

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.