The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mitochondrial Comparative Proteomics of Human Ovarian Cancer Cells and Their Platinum-resistant Sublines
Abstract
Resistance to platinum‐based chemotherapy is the major obstacle to successful treatment of ovarian cancer. It is evident that mitochondrial defects and the dysfunctions of oxidative phosphorylation and energy production in ovarian cancer cells were directly related to their resistance to platinum drugs. Using 2‐D DIGE, we compared mitochondrial proteins from two platinum‐sensitive human ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3 and A2780) with that of four platinum‐resistant sublines (SKOV3/CDDP, SKOV3/CBP, A2780/CDDP, and A2780/CBP). Among the 236 differentially expressed spots, five mitochondrial proteins (ATP‐α, PRDX3, PHB, ETF, and ALDH) that participate in the electron transport respiratory chain were identified through mass spectrometry. All of them are downregulated in one or two of the platinum‐resistant cell lines. Three proteins (ATP‐α, PRDX3, and PHB) were validated by using western blot and immunohistochemistry. There is a significant decrease of PHB in tumor tissues from ovarian cancer patients who were resistant to platinum‐based chemotherapies. This is the first direct mitochondrial proteomic comparison between platinum‐sensitive and resistant ovarian cancer cells. These studies demonstrated that 2‐D DIGE‐based proteomic analysis could be a powerful tool to investigate limited mitochondrial proteins, and the association of PHB expression with platinum resistance indicates that mitochondria defects may contribute to platinum resistance in ovarian cancer cells.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, mitochondrial alterations and the implication of proteins associated with oxidative phosphorylation have been directly associated with SK-OV-3 cells’ response to cytotoxic treatment [42].”
From Maceration, Soxhlet Extraction, and Steam Hydrodistillation of Anethum graveolens Seeds: Phytochemical Profiles and Cytotoxic Effects (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.3322/CA.2007.0010 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00058-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1368-7646(03)00059-1 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0482-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00054-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.RES.0000179773.18195.12 · DOI
- Wang X., 2001, The expanding role of mitochondria in apoptosis, Genes Dev., 15, 2922
- 10.2174/156800909788166600 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tox.2009.01.022 · DOI
- Saitou M., 2009, Mitochondrial ultrastructure‐associated chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer, Oncol. Rep., 21, 199
- 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2130 · DOI
- Andrews P. A., 1992, Mitochondrial defects in cis‐diamminedichloroplatinum(II)‐resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells, Cancer Res., 52, 1895
- Yan X. D., 2006, Objective to explore the different mechanisms of to cisplatin (CDDP) resistance in human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines by two different methods, Basic Clin. Med., 26, 739
- Li L., 2004, Development and characterization of five cell models for chemoresistance studies of human ovarian carcinoma, Int. J. Mol. Med., 14, 257
- 10.1007/BF00336786 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-59745-365-3_5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90463-J · DOI
- 10.2183/pjab1945.36.372 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac950914h · DOI
- 10.1007/s00125-007-0627-y · DOI
- Kurtz A., 2004, Somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in neurofibromatosis type 1‐associated tumors, Mol. Cancer Res., 2, 433, 10.1158/1541-7786.433.2.8 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI114537 · DOI
- Swenerton K., 1998, Salvage chemotherapy for refractory disease in Ovarian Cancer Controversies on Management, 169
- 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr050084g · DOI
- 10.1016/S0027-5107(97)00223-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/10408360500295477 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt793 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.351 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M300117-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M400079-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.05.013 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.200700795 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)02008-2 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1020959106412 · DOI
- 10.1038/35015709 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-56895-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/elps.1150181133 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr060402r · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.05.013 · DOI
- 10.4161/cbt.5.7.2975 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1205551 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.23351 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tem.2009.04.004 · DOI
- Yan X. D., 2007, Biological comparison of ovarian cancer resistant cell lines to cisplatin and taxol by two different administrations, Oncol. Rep., 17, 1163
- 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90068-S · DOI
Cited by
Goldiș, C., Racoviceanu, R., Negrea-Ghiulai, R., Mioc, A., Prodea, A., Atyim, E., Maksimovic, T., Lukinich-Gruia, A. T., Pricop, M.-A., & Șoica, C. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31183337
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, Z., Yin, J., He, H., Li, W., Hou, C., Qian, X., Mao, N., & Pan, L.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-19
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3789-3799
- ISSN
- 1615-9853
- 1615-9861
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2011-02-21)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.