Cited by 226Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretion

The proteome of lysosomes

Schröder, Bernd A., Wrocklage, Christian, Hasilik, Andrej, Saftig, Paul·2010·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Lysosomes are organelles of eukaryotic cells that are critically involved in the degradation of macromolecules mainly delivered by endocytosis and autophagocytosis. Degradation is achieved by more than 60 hydrolases sequestered by a single phospholipid bilayer. The lysosomal membrane facilitates interaction and fusion with other compartments and harbours transport proteins catalysing the export of catabolites, thereby allowing their recycling. Lysosomal proteins have been addressed in various proteomic studies that are compared in this review regarding the source of material, the organelle/protein purification scheme, the proteomic methodology applied and the proteins identified. Distinguishing true constituents of an organelle from co-purifying contaminants is a central issue in subcellular proteomics, with additional implications for lysosomes as being the site of degradation of many cellular and extracellular proteins. Although many of the lysosomal hydrolases were identified by classical biochemical approaches, the knowledge about the protein composition of the lysosomal membrane has remained fragmentary for a long time. Using proteomics many novel lysosomal candidate proteins have been discovered and it can be expected that their functional characterisation will help to understand functions of lysosomes at a molecular level that have been characterised only phenomenologically so far and to generally deepen our understanding of this indispensable organelle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201000196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 154 · Cited by 226

Authors
Schröder, B. A., Wrocklage, C., Hasilik, A., & Saftig, P.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-19
Volume
10
Issue
22
Pages
4053-4076
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2039921716
Cited by
226
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
lysosomes, lysosomal proteome, lysosomal enzymes, lysosomal membrane proteins, subcellular proteomics, organelle purification, pollutant removal, autophagy, endocytosis, macromolecule degradation, protein recycling
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Lipofuscin, Lysosomes, Membrane Proteins, Proteome, Proteomics, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review