Post‐harvest proteomics and food security
Open accessAbstract
To guarantee sufficient food supply for a growing world population, efforts towards improving crop yield and plant resistance should be complemented with efforts to reduce post‐harvest losses. Post‐harvest losses are substantial and occur at different stages of the food chain in developed and developing countries. In recent years, a substantially increasing interest can be seen in the application of proteomics to understand post‐harvest events. In the near future post‐harvest proteomics will be poised to move from fundamental research to aiding the reduction of food losses. Proteomics research can help in reducing food losses through (i) identification and validation of gene products associated to specific quality traits supporting marker‐assisted crop improvement programmes, (ii) delivering markers of initial quality that allow optimisation of distribution conditions and prediction of remaining shelf‐life for decision support systems and (iii) delivering early detection tools of physiological or pathogen‐related post‐harvest problems. In this manuscript, recent proteomics studies on post‐harvest and stress physiology are reviewed and discussed. Perspectives on future directions of post‐harvest proteomics studies aiming to reduce food losses are presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Pedreschi, R., Lurie, S., Hertog, M., Nicolaï, B., Mes, J., & Woltering, E.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Pedreschi, Romina
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12-13
- Pages
- 1772-1783
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2030866268
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Keywords
- post-harvest losses, food security, food quality markers, shelf life prediction, stress physiology
- MeSH terms
- Food Supply, Plant Proteins, Biomarkers, Crops, Agricultural, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review