Cited by 101Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

Towards comprehensive and quantitative proteomics for diagnosis and therapy of human disease

Open access
Cifani, Paolo, Kentsis, Alex·2017·PROTEOMICS

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Given superior analytical features, MS proteomics is well suited for the basic investigation and clinical diagnosis of human disease. Modern MS enables detailed functional characterization of the pathogenic biochemical processes, as achieved by accurate and comprehensive quantification of proteins and their regulatory chemical modifications. Here, we describe how high‐accuracy MS in combination with high‐resolution chromatographic separations can be leveraged to meet these analytical requirements in a mechanism‐focused manner. We review the quantification methods capable of producing accurate measurements of protein abundance and posttranslational modification stoichiometries. We then discuss how experimental design and chromatographic resolution can be leveraged to achieve comprehensive functional characterization of biochemical processes in complex biological proteomes. Finally, we describe current approaches for quantitative analysis of a common functional protein modification: reversible phosphorylation. In all, current instrumentation and methods of high‐resolution chromatography and MS proteomics are poised for immediate translation into improved diagnostic strategies for pediatric and adult diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201600079

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cifani, P., & Kentsis, A.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cifani, Paolo
  • Kentsis, Alex
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
17
Issue
1-2
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2953036329
Cited by
101
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American-Italian Cancer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R21 CA188881, P30 CA008748)
  • Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
  • Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation for Cancer Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
quantitative proteomics, protein abundance quantification, reversible phosphorylation, high-resolution chromatography, therapeutic biomarkers, childhood diseases
MeSH terms
Humans, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review