Cited by 22Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid in poor ovarian responders during in vitro fertilization

Oh, Jae Won, Kim, Seul Ki, Cho, Kyung‐Cho, Kim, Min‐Sik, Suh, Chang Suk, Lee, Jung Ryeol, Kim, Kwang Pyo·2017·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Poor ovarian response (POR) in controlled ovarian stimulation is often observed during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycles and it is a major problem. A POR has been found to be related to several factors, including advanced age, high body mass index, and history of ovarian or pelvic surgery. However, it is difficult to predict POR, as there are no specific biomarkers known. In this study, we used quantitative proteomic analyses to investigate potential biomarkers that can predict poor response during in vitro fertilization based on follicular fluid samples. A total of 1079 proteins were identified using a high‐resolution orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled online to a nanoflow‐LC system. It is notable that 65 upregulated and 66 downregulated proteins were found to be functionally enriched in poor responders. We also validated these differentially expressed proteins using a triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer for quantification of targeted proteins. Of the differentially expressed proteins, three proteins (pregnancy zone protein, renin, and sushi repeat‐containing protein SRPX) were regarded as statistically significant ( p < 0.05).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201600333

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oh, J. W., Kim, S. K., Cho, K., Kim, M., Suh, C. S., Lee, J. R., & Kim, K. P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Applied Sciences Kyung Hee University Yongin‐si Gyeonggi‐do Republic of Korea
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Jung Ryeol
  • Kim, Kwang Pyo
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
17
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2581058566
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2012M3A9B6055305)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
poor ovarian response, follicular fluid, in vitro fertilization, biomarkers, controlled ovarian stimulation, differentially expressed proteins, pregnancy zone protein, renin, protein quantification
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Ovary, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Transduction, Follicular Fluid, Proteomics, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review