Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid in poor ovarian responders during in vitro fertilization
Abstract
Poor ovarian response (POR) in controlled ovarian stimulation is often observed during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycles and it is a major problem. A POR has been found to be related to several factors, including advanced age, high body mass index, and history of ovarian or pelvic surgery. However, it is difficult to predict POR, as there are no specific biomarkers known. In this study, we used quantitative proteomic analyses to investigate potential biomarkers that can predict poor response during in vitro fertilization based on follicular fluid samples. A total of 1079 proteins were identified using a high‐resolution orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled online to a nanoflow‐LC system. It is notable that 65 upregulated and 66 downregulated proteins were found to be functionally enriched in poor responders. We also validated these differentially expressed proteins using a triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer for quantification of targeted proteins. Of the differentially expressed proteins, three proteins (pregnancy zone protein, renin, and sushi repeat‐containing protein SRPX) were regarded as statistically significant ( p < 0.05).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Renin levels in hFF differ in a variety of ovarian diseases or abnormalities.
“Renin levels in hFF also show differently in a variety of ovarian diseases or abnormalities according to a large number of proteomic analyses [36–38]”
Cites
Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid from fertile women
Zamah, A. M., Hassis, M. E., Albertolle, M. E., & Williams, K. E. (2015) · Clinical Proteomics · doi:10.1186/s12014-015-9077-6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, L., Bo, L., Luo, C., Yin, N., Jiang, W., Qian, F., Zhou, A., Lu, X., Guo, H., & Mao, C. (2024) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03997-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Renin levels in hFF also show differently in a variety of ovarian diseases or abnormalities according to a large number of proteomic analyses [36–38], and all above have provided the premise for the important physiological role of ovarian RAS.”
Background
- Authors
- Oh, J. W., Kim, S. K., Cho, K., Kim, M., Suh, C. S., Lee, J. R., & Kim, K. P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Applied Sciences Kyung Hee University Yongin‐si Gyeonggi‐do Republic of Korea
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Jung Ryeol
- Kim, Kwang Pyo
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2581058566
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2012M3A9B6055305)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- poor ovarian response, follicular fluid, in vitro fertilization, biomarkers, controlled ovarian stimulation, differentially expressed proteins, pregnancy zone protein, renin, protein quantification
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Ovary, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Transduction, Follicular Fluid, Proteomics, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review