The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure‐property relationships in polycaprolactone‐polyurethanes
Abstract
The structure‐property relationships of polycaprolactone‐based segmented polyurethanes were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), small‐angle x‐ray scattering (SAXS), wide‐angle x‐ray diffraction (WAXD), dynamic mechanical, and stress‐strain testing. The materials studied varied in hard‐segment type [4,4′‐diphenylmethane diisocyanate/butanediol (MDI/BD) or 4,4′‐dicyclohexyl methane diisocyanate/butanediol (H 12 MDI/BD)], soft‐segment molecular weight (830 or 2000 MW polycaprolactone), hard‐segment content (23–77% by weight), and thermal history. The materials with aromatic (MDI/BD) hard segments had semicrystalline hard‐segment domains, while the materials with aliphatic (H 12 MDI/BD) hard segment had mostly amorphous domains. Materials with the shorter polycaprolactone soft segment (830 MW) exhibited thermal and mechanical behavior which indicated a considerable degree of hard‐ and soft‐segment compatibility. The materials which contained a 2000‐MW polycaprolactone soft segment exhibited better‐defined microphase separation. SAXS was used to characterize the microphase structure of each system. The effects of hard‐segment content and soft‐segment molecular weight were similar for the aromatic (MDI) and aliphatic (H 12 MDI) hard‐segment‐based block copolymers. Changing the hard segment from aromatic to aliphatic gave materials with larger interfacial area and slightly higher tensile strength. A range of morphologies between isolated hard domains in a rubbery matrix and isolated rubbery domains in a hard matrix was observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Petrović, Z. S., & Ferguson, J. (1991) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/0079-6700(91)90011-9 · Cited by 895
Korley, L. T. J., Pate, B. D., Thomas, E. L., & Hammond, P. T. (2006) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.093 · Cited by 366
The structure, microphase-separated morphology, and property of polyurethanes and polyureas
He, Y., Xie, D., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8458-y · Cited by 289
Skarja, G. A., & Woodhouse, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition · doi:10.1163/156856298x00659 · Cited by 173
Carbonaceous fillers for shape memory actuation of polyurethane composites by resistive heating
Gunes, I. S., Jimenez, G. A., & Jana, S. C. (2009) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2008.11.053 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Bogart, J. W. C., Gibson, P. E., & Cooper, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-95
- ISSN
- 0098-1273 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-9385
- OpenAlex
- W2161901431
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure‐property relationships in polycaprolactone‐polyurethanes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pol.1983.180210106
- The paper
- Van Bogart, J. W. C., Gibson, P. E., & Cooper, S. L. (1983). Structure‐property relationships in polycaprolactone‐polyurethanes. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1983.180210106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.