The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biologically active polymers. V. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of modified poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) derivatives with quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts
Abstract
Antimicrobial copolymers bearing quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts based on a copolymer of glycidyl methacrylate and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate were synthesized. Poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) was modified for the introduction of chloromethyl groups by its reaction with chloroacetyl chloride. The chloroacetylated copolymer was modified for the production of quaternary ammonium or phosphonium salts. The antimicrobial activity of the obtained copolymers was studied against gram‐negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella sp., and Salmonella typhae), gram‐positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilus and B. cereus), and the fungus Trichophyton rubrum by the cut‐plug method. The results showed that the three copolymers had high antimicrobial activity. A control experiment was carried out on the main polymer without ammonium or phosphonium groups. The copolymer bearing quaternary salt made from tributyl phosphine was the most effective copolymer against both gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria and the fungus T. rubrum. The diameters of the inhibition zones ranged between 20 and 60 mm after 24 h. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 2384–2393, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, C. Z., Beck-Tan, N. C., Dhurjati, P., van Dyk, T. K., LaRossa, R. A., & Cooper, S. L. (2000) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0055495 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity
Muñoz-Bonilla, A., & Fernández-García, M. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.005 · Cited by 1,221
Antimicrobial polymers: mechanism of action, factors of activity, and applications
Timofeeva, L., & Kleshcheva, N. (2011) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2920-9 · Cited by 579
Antimicrobial Polymeric Materials with Quaternary Ammonium and Phosphonium Salts
Xue, Y., Xiao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16023626 · Cited by 578
Antibacterial cellulose fiber via RAFT surface graft polymerization
Roy, D., Knapp, J. S., Guthrie, J. T., & Perrier, S. (2008) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm700849j · Cited by 351
Lu, G., Wu, D., & Fu, R. (2007) · Reactive and Functional Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.01.008 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenawy, E., Abdel‐Hay, F. I., El‐Shanshoury, A. E. R., & El‐Newehy, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2384-2393
- ISSN
- 0887-624X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0518
- OpenAlex
- W2093342595
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biologically active polymers. V. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of modified poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) derivatives with quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pola.10325
- The paper
- Kenawy, E., Abdel‐Hay, F. I., El‐Shanshoury, A. E. R., & El‐Newehy, M. H. (2002). Biologically active polymers. V. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of modified poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) derivatives with quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.10325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.