The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Polymer–nanoparticle interfacial interactions in polymer nanocomposites: Confinement effects on glass transition temperature and suppression of physical aging
Abstract
The effects of confinement on glass transition temperature (Tg) and physical aging are measured in polystyrene (PS), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and poly(2‐vinyl pyridine) (P2VP) nanocomposites containing 10‐ to 15‐nm‐diameter silica nanospheres or 47‐nm‐diameter alumina nanospheres. Nanocomposites are made by spin coating films from sonicated solutions of polymer, nanofiller, and dye. The Tg s and physical aging rates are measured by fluorescence of trace levels of dye in the films. At 0.1–10 vol % nanofiller, Tg values can be enhanced or depressed relative to neat, bulk Tg (Tg,bulk) or invariant with nanofiller content. For alumina nanocomposites, Tg increases relative to Tg,bulk by as much as 16 K in P2VP, decreases by as much as 5 K in PMMA, and is invariant in PS. By analogy with thin polymer films, these results are explained by wetted P2VP–nanofiller interfaces with attractive interactions, nonwetted PMMA–nanofiller interfaces (free space at the interface), and wetted PS–nanofiller interfaces lacking attractive interactions, respectively. The presence of wetted or nonwetted interfaces is controlled by choice of solvent. For example, 0.1–0.6 vol % silica/PMMA nanocomposites exhibit Tg enhancements as large as 5 K or Tg reductions as large as 17 K relative to Tg,bulk when films are made from methyl ethyl ketone or acetic acid solutions, respectively. A factor of 17 reduction of physical aging rate relative to that of neat, bulk P2VP is demonstrated in a 4 vol % alumina/P2VP nanocomposite. This suggests that a strategy for achieving nonequilibrium, glassy polymeric systems that are stable or nearly stable to physical aging is to incorporate well‐dispersed nanoparticles possessing attractive interfacial interactions with the polymer. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 2935–2943, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites
Paul, D. R., & Robeson, L. M. (2008) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,317
Polymer Nanocomposites—A Comparison between Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Clay as Nanofillers
Bhattacharya, M. (2016) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma9040262 · Cited by 747
Müller, K., Bugnicourt, E., Latorre, M., Jorda, M., Echegoyen Sanz, Y., Lagaron, J., Miesbauer, O., Bianchin, A., Hankin, S., Bölz, U., et al. (2017) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano7040074 · Cited by 746
Glass transition of polymers in bulk, confined geometries, and near interfaces
Napolitano, S., Glynos, E., & Tito, N. B. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5284 · Cited by 420
Krishnamoorti, R., & Vaia, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.21319 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Rittigstein, P., & Torkelson, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2935-2943
- ISSN
- 0887-6266 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0488
- OpenAlex
- W2157792650
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer–nanoparticle interfacial interactions in polymer nanocomposites: Confinement effects on glass transition temperature and suppression of physical aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/polb.20925
- The paper
- Rittigstein, P., & Torkelson, J. M. (2006). Polymer–nanoparticle interfacial interactions in polymer nanocomposites: Confinement effects on glass transition temperature and suppression of physical aging. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.20925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.