Cited by 70Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareFamily Support in Illness

Feasibility and usefulness of the ‘Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care’ in clinical oncology practice

Shimizu, Ken, Ishibashi, Yuki, Umezawa, Shino, Izumi, Hideko, Akizuki, Nobuya, Ogawa, Asao, Fujiwara, Yasuhiro, Ando, Masashi +7 more·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Although the implementation of routine screening for distress is desirable, doing so is difficult in today's busy clinical oncology practice. We developed the ‘Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care’ (DISPAC program) as a practical means of screening for and facilitating the treatment of major depression and adjustment disorders in cancer patients. This study assessed the feasibility and usefulness of the DISPAC program in actual clinical situations. Methods: As part of the DISPAC program, nurses administered a psychological screening measure, the Distress and Impact Thermometer (DIT), to consecutive cancer patients visiting an outpatient clinic in the waiting room. The attending physician then recommended psycho‐oncology service referral to all positively screened patients. We compared the proportion of patients referred to a psycho‐oncology service during the DISPAC period with the usual care period. Results: Of the targeted 491 patients treated during the DISPAC period, 91.9% (451/491) completed the DIT; the results were positive in 37.0% (167/451), recommendations for referrals were given to 93.4% (156/167), and 25.0% (39/156) accepted the referral. Ultimately 5.3% (26/491) of the targeted patients were treated by psycho‐oncology service as having major depression or adjustment disorders, a significantly higher proportion than during the usual care period (0.3%; p<0.001). The nurses required 132±58 s per person to administer the DIT. Conclusions: The DISPAC program is useful for facilitating the care of cancer patients with psychological distress. Nevertheless, the acceptance of referrals by patients and the reduction of the burden placed on nurses are areas requiring improvement. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1616

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facilitators and barriers to the use of other formats such as group or internet-based therapies may differ considerably from those that relate to accepting the more personalised individual intervention formats of telephone or face-to-face.

    “Facilitators and barriers to the use of other formats such as group or internet-based therapies may differ considerably from those that relate to accepting the more personalised individual intervention formats of telephone or face-to-face [48]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimizu, K., Ishibashi, Y., Umezawa, S., Izumi, H., Akizuki, N., Ogawa, A., Fujiwara, Y., Ando, M., Katsumata, N., Tamura, K., Kouno, T., Shimizu, C., Yonemori, K., Yunokawa, M., & Uchitomi, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Uchitomi, Yosuke
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-27
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
718-725
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2069079317
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22790580)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
psychological distress screening, cancer patients, major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, referral acceptance, screening feasibility
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Breast Neoplasms, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Feasibility Studies, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Unknown Primary, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Sick Role, Patient Satisfaction, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review