Body image predicts quality of life in men with prostate cancer
Abstract
Objective: Most men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the USA will survive. Of the many aspects of survivorship affected by prostate cancer, body image receives limited attention despite some indication that it may be important to men with the disease. The present study investigated how body image changes over time and the relations between changes in body image and quality of life (QOL) in men with prostate cancer. Methods: In a longitudinal design, patients (N = 74) completed questionnaires before treatment (T1) and at 1 month (T2) and 2 years (T3) following treatment completion. Results: Growth curve modeling indicated that there was no significant change over time in group‐level body image scores. However, hormone treatment was associated with a negative trajectory of change over 2 years. Also, analysis of individual difference scores indicated that ≥50% of patients demonstrated change of at least 0.5 standard deviation between time points. Hierarchical regression indicated that change in body image between T1 and T2 was significantly associated with change in QOL between T1 and T3, while controlling for demographic variables, treatment, treatment‐related functioning, and general and treatment‐specific positive expectations. In predicting change in body image between T1 and T2, treatment‐specific positive expectation was the only significant predictor. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that body image is an important component of the prostate cancer experience. Findings suggest that body image has a meaningful association with QOL among prostate cancer survivors.Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cancer-related impairments often go along with disturbances in bodily well-being.
“Cancer-related impairments often go along with disturbances in bodily well-being [9–14].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Taylor‐Ford, M., Meyerowitz, B. E., D'Orazio, L. M., Christie, K. M., Gross, M. E., & Agus, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Department of Psychology University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA
- Corresponding author
- Meyerowitz, Beth E.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 756-761
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1957963781
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- body image, quality of life, prostate cancer, prostate cancer survivors, hormone therapy, androgen deprivation therapy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Image, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Survivors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review