Cited by 24Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchDiabetes Management and Education

National study of chronic disease self-management: 6-month and 12-month findings among cancer survivors and non-cancer survivors

Open access
Salvatore, Alicia L., Ahn, SangNam, Jiang, Luohua, Lorig, Kate, Ory, Marcia G.·2015·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the applicability of the Stanford Chronic Disease Self‐Management Program (CDSMP) for cancer survivors and compared outcomes among cancer survivors and participants with other chronic diseases (non‐cancer survivors). Methods: Participants were older adults (n = 1170) enrolled in the National Study of CDSMP. Detailed information about physical and psychosocial health status and health and healthcare behaviors was collected from participants (n = 116 cancer survivors and n = 1054 non‐cancer survivors) via self‐report before CDSMP participation and at 6‐month and 12‐month follow‐ups. Linear and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess baseline‐to‐6‐month and baseline‐to‐12‐month changes. Results: Among cancer survivors, general health, depression, and sleep significantly improved from baseline to 6 months. These significant changes were sustained at 12 months. Communication with physician, medication compliance, pain, days in poor physical health, days in poor mental health, and days kept from usual activities and physical activity also improved significantly from baseline to 12 months. Among non‐cancer survivors, all outcomes except medication compliance and stress improved significantly from baseline to 6 months. At 12 months, medication compliance also improved significantly. Conclusions: Findings suggest that participation in CDSMP, an evidence‐based chronic disease self‐management intervention not specifically tailored for cancer survivorship, may significantly improve physical and psychosocial health status and key health and healthcare behaviors among cancer survivors. Additional research is needed to elucidate cancer survivors' unique needs and examine the benefits of tailored versions of CDSMP. Nevertheless, CDSMP, available at scale nationally and internationally, is a promising intervention for cancer survivors and should be considered a valuable component of survivorship care. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3783

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Adler NE, Page AEK (eds.). Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Psychosocial Services to Cancer Patients/Families in a Community Setting. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC), 2008. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK4015/
  2. Risendal BC, Dwyer A, Lorig K, Seidel RW, Coombs L, Ory MG. Meeting the public health challenge of cancer survivorship: results of the evaluation of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) for cancer survivors. Front Public Health. In press. *Correspondence to: College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 NE 13th Street, Room 417, PO Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, USA. E-mail: alicia- salvatore@ouhsc.edu

Authors
Salvatore, A. L., Ahn, S., Jiang, L., Lorig, K., & Ory, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Salvatore, Alicia L.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1714-1722
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2115407540
Cited by
24
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act through the Administration on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
chronic disease self-management, cancer survivors, survivorship care, older adults, depression, sleep, medication adherence, physical activity, pain, psychosocial health, health behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Self Care, United States, Program Evaluation, Survivors, Self Report, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review