Body image mediates the effect of cancer‐related stigmatization on depression: A new target for intervention
Abstract
Objective: Because cancer‐related stigmatization is prevalent but difficult to change, research on its impact on psychological burden and respective intervening variables is needed. Therefore, we investigated the effect of stigmatization on depressive symptomatology and whether body image mediates this relationship. Methods: This bicentric study assessed patients of 4 major tumor entities. We measured stigmatization (SIS‐D), depressive symptomatology (PHQ‐9), and body image (FKB‐20). Applying multiple mediator analyses, we calculated the total effect of stigmatization on depressive symptomatology and the indirect effects exerted via the 2 body image scales rejecting body evaluation and vital body dynamics . Results: Among the 858 cancer patients recruited (breast: n = 297; prostate: n = 268; colorectal: n = 168; lung: n = 125), stigmatization showed total effects on depressive symptomatology across all stigma dimensions (all p total sample < .001). Except for lung cancer patients, this result was replicated for each cancer group. Body image as a whole was shown to mediate the effect across all samples ( γ total sample = .04, 95%‐CI: 0.03‐0.06). Among the total sample and prostate cancer patients, the mediating effect of rejecting body evaluation was significantly larger than the effect of vital body dynamics (d total sample = .02, 95%‐CI: 0.01‐0.04). Conclusions: Perceived stigmatization is an important and generalizable risk factor for depressive symptomatology among cancer patients. Apart from interventions addressing stigmatization, improving body image could additionally help to reduce the psychological burden in stigmatized patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cancer-related impairments often go along with disturbances in bodily well-being.
“Cancer-related impairments often go along with disturbances in bodily well-being [9–14].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Esser, P., Mehnert, A., Johansen, C., Hornemann, B., Dietz, A., & Ernst, J.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University Tumor Center (UCC) University Medical Center Dresden Dresden Germany
- Corresponding author
- Esser, Peter
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 193-198
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2732935796
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Roland Ernst Stiftung für Gesundheitswesen (RES 7/15)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- body image, depression, depressive symptoms, mediation, psychological burden, cancer patients, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Stereotyping, Colorectal Neoplasms, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review