Cited by 53Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementMental Health Treatment and Access

Body image mediates the effect of cancer‐related stigmatization on depression: A new target for intervention

Esser, Peter, Mehnert, Anja, Johansen, Christoffer, Hornemann, Beate, Dietz, Andreas, Ernst, Jochen·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Because cancer‐related stigmatization is prevalent but difficult to change, research on its impact on psychological burden and respective intervening variables is needed. Therefore, we investigated the effect of stigmatization on depressive symptomatology and whether body image mediates this relationship. Methods: This bicentric study assessed patients of 4 major tumor entities. We measured stigmatization (SIS‐D), depressive symptomatology (PHQ‐9), and body image (FKB‐20). Applying multiple mediator analyses, we calculated the total effect of stigmatization on depressive symptomatology and the indirect effects exerted via the 2 body image scales rejecting body evaluation and vital body dynamics . Results: Among the 858 cancer patients recruited (breast: n = 297; prostate: n = 268; colorectal: n = 168; lung: n = 125), stigmatization showed total effects on depressive symptomatology across all stigma dimensions (all p total sample < .001). Except for lung cancer patients, this result was replicated for each cancer group. Body image as a whole was shown to mediate the effect across all samples ( γ total sample = .04, 95%‐CI: 0.03‐0.06). Among the total sample and prostate cancer patients, the mediating effect of rejecting body evaluation was significantly larger than the effect of vital body dynamics (d total sample = .02, 95%‐CI: 0.01‐0.04). Conclusions: Perceived stigmatization is an important and generalizable risk factor for depressive symptomatology among cancer patients. Apart from interventions addressing stigmatization, improving body image could additionally help to reduce the psychological burden in stigmatized patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4494

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 53

Authors
Esser, P., Mehnert, A., Johansen, C., Hornemann, B., Dietz, A., & Ernst, J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University Tumor Center (UCC) University Medical Center Dresden Dresden Germany
Corresponding author
Esser, Peter
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
193-198
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2732935796
Cited by
53
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Roland Ernst Stiftung für Gesundheitswesen (RES 7/15)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
body image, depression, depressive symptoms, mediation, psychological burden, cancer patients, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Stereotyping, Colorectal Neoplasms, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review