Cited by 18Cancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

A user centered design approach to development of an online self‐management program for cancer survivors: Springboard Beyond Cancer

Leach, Corinne R., Diefenbach, Michael A., Fleszar, Sara, Alfano, Catherine M., Stephens, Robert L., Riehman, Kara, Hudson, Shawna V.·2019·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute launched and evaluated a personalized online program leveraging behavioral science principles to help people self‐manage physical and emotional symptoms, improve communication skills, and lead healthier lives during and after a cancer diagnosis. Methods: Cancer survivors were recruited from an academic medical and a community clinical setting (N = 40) to complete in‐person user testing of the Springboard Beyond Cancer website, which included action decks and content to promote self‐management. Action decks were printable or savable collections of information and action steps related to a cancer topic or treatment side effect. Participants performed structured tasks to evaluate the program's content and usability. Comments and reactions were recorded, and qualitative thematic analyses were conducted. Results: Most participants successfully found information about fatigue (95%), pain (83%), sexual side effects (90%), and support groups (85%). Survivors, particularly those in treatment, found information on the site to be clear, concise, and meeting their needs. Use of action decks to create self‐management plans was inconsistent. Survivors reported needing more instruction and support within the program on how to best utilize enhanced functionality in action decks to prioritize their most pressing concerns. Conclusions: Early stakeholder engagement throughout the multiple phases of prototyping and deployment are needed to fully maximize end user engagement. Providing actionable self‐management content and activating tools to cancer survivors via an eHealth program is a feasible and scalable approach to increasing access to self‐management tools and addressing cancer survivor needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research suggests that single-page websites or apps with properly labeled interactions and different color depths, familiar icons, and images are more usable and acceptable to cancer survivors.

    “Previous research has yielded comparable results [64,65,69-71], suggesting that single-page websites or apps that enable properly labeled interactions and make use of different color depths, familiar icons, and images are more usable and acceptable to cancer survivors.”
  • These findings echo many limitations and development requirements gathered in previous research aimed at developing digital programs for supporting cancer survivors.

    “These findings echo many of the limitations and development requirements gathered in previous research aimed at developing digital programs for supporting cancer survivors [64,65,68-73].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 18

Authors
Leach, C. R., Diefenbach, M. A., Fleszar, S., Alfano, C. M., Stephens, R. L., Riehman, K., & Hudson, S. V.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Department of Psychological Sciences University of California Merced California
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Leach, Corinne R.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-14
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
2060-2067
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2966330725
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-01-23)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society (Intramural Research Grant, no award number)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
cancer survivors, self-management, online self-management program, user-centered design, e-health, usability testing, fatigue, pain, sexual side effects, support groups, stakeholder engagement, behavioral science, survivorship care
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Self-Management, Activities of Daily Living, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Pain, Research Design, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review