A user centered design approach to development of an online self‐management program for cancer survivors: Springboard Beyond Cancer
Abstract
Objective: The American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute launched and evaluated a personalized online program leveraging behavioral science principles to help people self‐manage physical and emotional symptoms, improve communication skills, and lead healthier lives during and after a cancer diagnosis. Methods: Cancer survivors were recruited from an academic medical and a community clinical setting (N = 40) to complete in‐person user testing of the Springboard Beyond Cancer website, which included action decks and content to promote self‐management. Action decks were printable or savable collections of information and action steps related to a cancer topic or treatment side effect. Participants performed structured tasks to evaluate the program's content and usability. Comments and reactions were recorded, and qualitative thematic analyses were conducted. Results: Most participants successfully found information about fatigue (95%), pain (83%), sexual side effects (90%), and support groups (85%). Survivors, particularly those in treatment, found information on the site to be clear, concise, and meeting their needs. Use of action decks to create self‐management plans was inconsistent. Survivors reported needing more instruction and support within the program on how to best utilize enhanced functionality in action decks to prioritize their most pressing concerns. Conclusions: Early stakeholder engagement throughout the multiple phases of prototyping and deployment are needed to fully maximize end user engagement. Providing actionable self‐management content and activating tools to cancer survivors via an eHealth program is a feasible and scalable approach to increasing access to self‐management tools and addressing cancer survivor needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research suggests that single-page websites or apps with properly labeled interactions and different color depths, familiar icons, and images are more usable and acceptable to cancer survivors.
“Previous research has yielded comparable results [64,65,69-71], suggesting that single-page websites or apps that enable properly labeled interactions and make use of different color depths, familiar icons, and images are more usable and acceptable to cancer survivors.”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
These findings echo many limitations and development requirements gathered in previous research aimed at developing digital programs for supporting cancer survivors.
“These findings echo many of the limitations and development requirements gathered in previous research aimed at developing digital programs for supporting cancer survivors [64,65,68-73].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Leach, C. R., Diefenbach, M. A., Fleszar, S., Alfano, C. M., Stephens, R. L., Riehman, K., & Hudson, S. V.
- Affiliations
- American Cancer Society (US)
- Northwell Health (US)
- Department of Psychological Sciences University of California Merced California
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leach, Corinne R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-14
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2060-2067
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2966330725
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2020-01-23)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society (Intramural Research Grant, no award number)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, self-management, online self-management program, user-centered design, e-health, usability testing, fatigue, pain, sexual side effects, support groups, stakeholder engagement, behavioral science, survivorship care
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Self-Management, Activities of Daily Living, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Pain, Research Design, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review