Cited by 67Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

A critical literature review of dyadic web‐based interventions to support cancer patients and their caregivers, and directions for future research

Luo, Xingjuan, Gao, Lihong, Li, Jieyu, Lin, Yi, Zhao, Jie, Li, Qiuping·2020·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: With the rapid development of the Internet, e‐health interventions are becoming popular and are showing positive impacts. Cancer affects not only patients but also their caregivers, leading to a recognition that cancer patient–caregiver dyads cope with cancer as a unit rather than as individuals. The objectives of this paper are to explore web‐based interventions for cancer patient–caregiver dyads coping with cancer from the aspects of intervention content, delivery format, outcome measurements, and outcomes and to provide recommendations on developing patient‐caregiver dyadic web‐based interventions for future research. Methods: Literature focused on cancer patient–caregiver dyadic web‐based interventions, published in English or Chinese from the launch of five databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBase, Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded) to April 2019, was systematically searched. Manual searching through the references of full‐text articles was also conducted. Results: Of a total of 812 articles, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. The content of these web‐based dyadic interventions mainly included information support, communication and support, skills‐building, and psycho‐education. These web‐based interventions reported a small to large positive impact on patients with cancer and their caregivers in terms of physical health (d = 0.17‐0.75), psychological health (d = 0.04‐0.80), overall quality of life (d = 0.20‐0.68), and dyadic relationship (d = 0.30‐0.95). Conclusions: Web‐based dyadic interventions can be designed for tailored content, which benefits both patients and their caregivers. Future research on cancer patient–caregiver web‐based interventions should be conducted in diverse cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 67

Authors
Luo, X., Gao, L., Li, J., Lin, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, Q.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Jie
  • Li, Qiuping
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-19
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
38-48
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2984660065
Cited by
67
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773297)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
online intervention, e-health, caregiver burden, dyads, quality of life, psychological well-being, psychoeducation, skill development, intervention content, intervention delivery format, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review